• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / My most life-changing piece of photographic equipment

My most life-changing piece of photographic equipment

October 8, 2022 JimK 5 Comments

I remember several photographic purchases that changed my photography dramatically for the better.

  • Nikon S2, in 1957
  • Nikon FTn, in 1966
  • Hasselblad 501c
  • Linhof Master Technika
  • Nikon D3
  • Arca Swiss C1 cube
  • Sony a9
  • 8×10 Polaroid processor

But there’s one that stands head and shoulders above the rest for impact on my photography, the Foba Portrait Pro camera stand. It’s one of the cheaper Foba stands, but it’s not inexpensive. I imagine that I’d be happy with any good quality camera stand. But I had no idea when I bought it what a difference it would make.

It was a happenstance purchase. I had a credit at my photo dealer, and the money was burring a hole in my pocket. I’d been eyeing camera stands in stores for 50 years, but I’d never owned one. This one was light enough that two people could assemble and set it up. So I ordered it, not having much in the way of expectations.

I was then, and still am, doing most of my photography in the studio, which is the natural place to use a camera stand. You’d have to be a masochist to try to use one in the field. Camera stands are big. Camera stands are heavy; in fact their great weight allows them to do what they do better than if they were made out of carbon fiber.

What’s their big advantage? It’s actually threefold: they allow precise and rapid positioning of the camera, and they do it in a way that doesn’t sacrifice stability. And they do it in a way that allows positions and angles that are either impossible, or awkward using tripods.

  • Want to shoot straight down? No problem.
  • Want the camera positioned really close to, or even over, a table? Piece of cake.
  • Want to move the camera one centimeter to the right? Easy.
  • Want a more stable platform than you could possibly get with a tripod? At your service.
  • Want to raise the camera by 1 cm without using a shake-inducing center column. Falling off a log.
  • Want the camera up near the ceiling, or down near the floor? Can do.
  • Want a computer/monitor/accessory table that is always near the camera? Snap it right in.
  • Want a piece of gear that feels precise under your hands? Got you covered.

Your mileage may vary, but if you’ve been tempted, give it a whirl.

 

The Last Word

← Fuji 20-35/4 vs 30/3.5 landscape field curvature GFX 100S, X2D 30-second-exposure self heating →

Comments

  1. Erik says

    October 28, 2022 at 12:00 am

    very unique and interesting piece of gear. never even know this existed. if it wasn’t so damn expensive, i’d give it a try.

    Reply
  2. Ellis Vener says

    November 14, 2022 at 6:54 am

    If I had a studio – 99% of my work is done at client’s locations or in the field – the very first first photographic tool I’d buy is a camera stand, and it would be a Foba. The photographer I apprenticed with in the 1980s had one made by Arkay and while it was okay it dod not have the sliding arm of the Foba, Cambo, and other brands of camera stands I have used in rental studios since then. Far and away the best, and the best bang for the buck have been the ones made by Foba.

    There was a photographer I knew in the 1980s-’90s who shot cars on location with an 8×10 Sinar P2. His clients ranged from Ferrari to Ford plus various magazines. The locations ranged from cities to deserts. He and his crew always brought the bigger brother of this camera stand – the Foba Asaba model – with them. I can not imagine how much hassle that must have been but he swore by it. I imagine his assistants swore at it.

    Reply
  3. Darius says

    December 23, 2022 at 11:03 pm

    I am curious about the A9 making the list, do you have this in another post how the A9 changed your photography?
    Many thanks

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 24, 2022 at 10:15 am

      The a9 allowed me to take pictures where silence was essential without having to worry much about the illumination banding that occurred with slower electronic shutters. And the frame rate let me do sequences I couldn’t otherwise do.

      Reply
  4. Mark Rehfield says

    December 29, 2022 at 8:34 am

    My major enabling technologies have some similarities to yours:
    Pentax H1a in 1967
    Nikon FTn in 1970 (which I still have and occasionally put film through!)
    Beseler 45MCRX enlarger purchased in 1971, used until I moved to Central Coast in 2013
    Cambo 4×5 in 1972 (the Linhof Technical I bought in 1971 was not as effortless to use movements on)
    Hasselblad 500cm in 1980 FINALLY gave me the portability, image quality, and flexibility to do medium format travel, nature, people photography.
    Photoshop in mid ‘90s
    Nikon D100 in 2003
    Nikon D3 for high sensitivity allowing nighttime and astrophotography
    Sony A9 for silent photography without artifacts and sensor stabilization not available on DSLRs
    iPhone for near 100% availability of imaging capability
    Next???

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.