• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / NEX-7 — purple corner effect varies with aperture

NEX-7 — purple corner effect varies with aperture

January 7, 2012 JimK 3 Comments

The day before yesterday, Lloyd Chambers published an alert about NEX-7 color shifts that vary with aperture. You can read it here Yesterday, he published an extensive set of photographs showing the effect for many M-mount lenses. To see the report, you’ll have to subscribe to his Digital Advanced Photography report. I recommend that you do that.

I have confirmed the effect. The changes from the baseline, f/8, results take place mostly at wide apertures, and in general show a strengthening of the “purple corner” effect. This is not simply an artifact of his or my test methods, which are different from Chambers’. You can see it in the real world.

Here’s a picture of a frosty meadow made with the NEX-7 and the 35mm f/2 M-mount Zeiss Biogon at f/2:

Here’s the same scene at f/8

Both images are uncorrected.

Next: measurements.

 

The Last Word

← NEX-7 — purple corners with Zeiss 21mm Distagon NEX-7 — measuring how corner color errors vary with aperture →

Comments

  1. twiki says

    January 31, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    I’m rather alarmed that even a fairly wide lens (35mm f/2 M-mount Zeiss Biogon) displays this effect. All the earlier reports seemed to be with much wider lenses, like the 21mm CV.
    Is there an inherent flaw in the design of the NEX7?
    I’m guessing that the NEX5n is relatively unaffected by this.

    If I’m primarily a JPEG shooter and want to go as wide as, say, 17mm (35mm equivalent), without having to stop down to f8, should I completely rule out the NEX range?
    I’ve not seen this sort of thing reported for m43 even on lenses like the 7-14mm Panny. Or do the Lumix’es fix it all in firmware?

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    January 31, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    A few points:

    1) The equivalent lens of a 35mm lens on a full-frame 35mm camera is 23 or 24mm, not 17mm. The multiplier for the NEX-7 is one and a half.

    2) I’ve tested the NEX-5, and it’s not nearly as bad for corner color errors. I’ve read that the NEX-5n is more like the NEX-5 than the NEX-7 for corner color flaws.

    3) JPEG or RAW, the results look similar for corner color errors.

    4) This problem seems to be related to the NEX-7 sensor and its treatment of incident angles greatly different than orthogonal, but both the Leica M8 and M9 have it to some degree.

    5) The M9 does some firmware fixes, but they’re not totally successful. Other cameras may do the same. The NEX-7 may tweak things in firmware. See the next comment.

    6) If you want a 35mm equivalent and don’t want to mess with correcting corner errors, the Carl Zeiss 24mm f/1.8 is a good bet. Whether because of Sony firmware magic sauce or its inherent design, it has little in the way of corner errors.

    Jim

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Anonymous says:
    May 13, 2012 at 3:52 am

    […] […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.