• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Nikon 70-200/2.8S screening test

Nikon 70-200/2.8S screening test

October 3, 2020 JimK 1 Comment

I received the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 S lens for Zx cameras yesterday. First impressions:

  • About the same size as the 70-200mm f/2.8E, but noticeably lighter.
  • The traditional slide switches on the barrel are MIA, and their function is handled by menu selections in the camera; I don’t think this is a good move.
  • Has the window at the top of the lens that can be used to display distance, focal length, etc. that we saw on the 24-70/2.8S.
  • Comes with the thin cloth sock, even though the box says there’s a case inside.

I performed my usual lens screening test. Parameters:

  • Camera: Nikon Z7
  • File format lossless compressed raw, 14-bit precision
  • Tested at 70, 105, and 200 mm.
  • Target distance 60 meters at 200 mm, 40 meters at 105 and 70 mm.
  • RRS  legs, Arca-Swiss C1
  • 2-second self timer.
  • 3 sets of 9 images at each focal length, picked the best set in post
  • Manually focused at center shot of each set, left focus alone for the side and corner shots
  • ISO 64
  • F/2.8
  • 1/800 second.
  • EFCS

Developed in Lightroom with the following settings:

  • Adobe Color Profile
  • Sharpening: amount 20, radius 1, detail 0
  • White balanced to grey background of Siemens star
  • Slight Exposure boost
  • All other settings at default.

Manual focusing was a bit dicey thanks to the Z7’s truly abominable focus by wire algorithm combined with the sensitivity of the lens ring. The Z7’s FBW is as bad as the Sony NEX 5’s. Sony has come a long way since then. Nikon should have been paying attention.

Here’s a full frame shot at 70 mm.

 

 

1:1 crops at 70 mm, wide open follow. This is a composite of all nine images in the best series, with the sidea and corners offset so you can see which is which.

70-200/2.8S at 70 mm, f/2.8

This is a fine result. The lower right corner is a little softer than the upper left. I’ve never found a perfect lens with this test, and perfect lenses are as scarce as hen’s teeth, but this isn’t far off. Corner falloff is not bad.

At 105 mm:

 

70-200/2.8S at 105mm, f/2.8

This looks fine, too.

At 200 mm.

70-200/2.8S at 200mm, f/2.8

Corner falloff is a lot worse. I’m surprised at this. You’d think this would be one place where the big throat of the Z mount would make a difference.

At all three focal lengths, the lens is capable of paying down detail on the sensor that the sensor can’t resolve, even in the corners, wide open. This lens probably has some focus curvature, so if you were focusing in the corners, it would be even sharper there.

 

Nikon Z6/7

← Why so few posts? Nikon 70-200/2.8S vs 70-200/2.8E light falloff →

Comments

  1. Erik Kaffehr says

    October 3, 2020 at 11:20 pm

    Nice to see you posting again! It seems that zoom is a nice lens.

    It seems that you mostly get lenses that are OK!

    Best regards
    Erik

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.