• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100 images

Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100 images

April 2, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here.

In this post, I’m going to do something that regular readers are very familiar — dare I say, bored — with: pushing bookcase pictures in post. That’s a photographically instructive and very useful exercise in ISOless cameras like the ones I’ve been reviewing lately. It’s probably cruel to do it to an ISOful camera like the D5.

I’m gonna do it anyway.

  • Camera on tripod
  • Nikon 24/1.4 lens set to f/5.6
  • ISO 100
  • EFCS
  • Shutter delay = 3 seconds
  • Liveview focusing
  • Developed with Lr 2015.5
  • Default settings except for WB
  • WB to the normal exposure, and applied that to all others

The bookcase with a correct exposure:

Normal exposure
Normal exposure

I made a series of exposures progressively one stop shorter shutter speed until I got to five stops underexposed. In Lr, I pushed the images using the Exposure control by as much as they’d been underexposed.

1 stop under
1 stop under
2 stops under
2 stops under
3 stops under
3 stops under
4 stops under
4 stops under
5 stops under
5 stops under

OK, now comes the cruel part. I’ll show you 200% enlargements of an area that I favor for these tests because of the low values.

Normal exposure
Normal exposure

The shadows look clean, but we haven’t pushed them yet. We’ve got some serious moire going with the cloth binding of the gray book.

1 stop under
1 stop under

Shadows still OK

2 stops under
2 stops under

Still OK

3 stops under
3 stops under

Not bad.

4 stops under
4 stops under

Still not bad. Picking up noticeable noise in the blue. We’re losing the moire; I’m not sure what that’s about. I’m guessing that the slight amount of added noise introduces a little unsharpness, which acts sort of like an AA filter.

5 stops under
5 stops under

There’s some visible noise, in the black, but I wouldn’t call it bad. The noise in the blue is more apparent. Remember, you’re looking at 200% blowups here. Do you see banding? I sure don’t.

Now I’ll make things harder for the camera. I’ll turn off all noise reduction. I’ll also turn off sharpening, becasue I always do that as a starting place when I turn off noise reduction.

Normal exopsure
Normal exopsure
1 stop under
1 stop under
2 stops under
2 stops under
3 stops under
3 stops under
4 stops under
4 stops under

A little chroma noise, but it’s not bad. Note that the moire is still hanging around. Now I have a new theory.  I think in the first series, the Lr noise reduction filter was getting stronger as the noise rose. so that it was acting as the AA filter, not the noise itself. Of course, all this talk about AA filtering won’t bear close inspection since the image has already been sampled, but you take my meaning, I’m sure.

5 stops under
5 stops under

The five stop push results in visible noise, with a fair amount of chroma noise in the black and blue books.

The dreaded banding that I’ve been reading about didn’t show up.

What else can we do to really torture these images? How about a +100 shadow move.

Normal exposure
Normal exposure
1 stop under
1 stop under
3 stops under
3 stops under

OK, now we’re seeing noise.

4 stops under
4 stops under

Lots of noise.

5 stops under
5 stops under

Tons of noise. But where’s that ugly banding? I can see a little, but I’ve seen worse.

I’ve seen a lot of reports saying that you can’t boost the shadows at all with the D5 at ISO 100 before you run into terrible problems. That’s no what I’m seeing here. It’s no D810 or a7RII, but it’s not bad for the kind of camera it is.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII — FPRN Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100/125 images →

Comments

  1. jtra says

    April 3, 2016 at 12:51 pm

    Hi Jim. If you would go to http://www.dpreview.com/news/9402203921/nikon-d5-shows-drop-in-dynamic-range and select D5 image with ISO 100 1/320s +6EV in the top left quadrant of image selection, there are big red bands in the image. It is not usual banding where bands are few pixels, it is something visible with 560px width image, it is more like there three bands, top, middle and bottom. If you would reduce to just +5EV version they are still visible, but that not that easy to see. At +4EV they are not visible enough to care. Does your camera shows the same in similar conditions?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.