• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting

Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting

March 29, 2016 JimK 22 Comments

I got my hands on  a Nikon D5 today, and I’ll be reporting on how well it tests out over the next week or two. The first thing I do when I get a new camera is test for read noise by making a series of dark field exposures.

Without removing the body cap, I made a series of exposures at all the ISO settings, with the shutter speed set to 1/1000 second, and the raw format set to 140bit lossless compression. I have, at least for now, discarded the three settings below the base ISO, but I’ve included the settings above the maximum numeric ISO setting on the camera, converted to ISO sensitivity.

First, read noise in a 200×200 central section of the raw file vs ISO setting:

D5 RN vs ISO all

There are a three things that stand out. The first is that sawtooth behavior up through about ISO 3200. That indicates some sensor behavior that’s reminiscent of what Canon does, and that is unlike anything I’ve ever seen in a Nikon sensor before.

The second is the droop in the curve above about ISO 100000. To me, that indicates digital processing of some kind aimed at minimizing noise.

The third is that the green channel seems to have lower noise than the red and blue ones.

Here’s a closer look, leaving out ISO settings above 50K:

D5 RN vs ISO sub

The sawtooth periodicity seems to be one stop, with the exception of the third peak. At present, I don’t know what that’s about.

Here’s the engineering dynamic range, both including and without the really high ISO settings.

D5 EDR vs ISO all

D5 EDR vs ISO sub

EDR’s of around 11 are not terribly impressive these days. However, EDRs that stay above ten until ISO 6400 are pretty nice. I have not corrected these EDR numbers for sensor size.

If we look at the input-referred read noise both for all but the lowest ISOs and with the nosebleed ISOs left out, we can see that there is something unusual going on:

D5 input ref RN vs ISO all

Now it’s readily apparent just how strange that high-ISO droop is.

D5 input ref RN vs ISO sub

The vertical axis on these last two graphs is just relative stops. In a day or so I’ll have full well capacity and I’ll be able to present the data in electrons.

Looking at the mean of the black frame selections, we see only moderate indications of color casting at ISO 50K and below.The shadows could go a bit orange above ISO 8000.

D5 NF mu vs ISO

Note that the nominal mean is 400 counts, which is a first for a Nikon that I’ve tested. The D810 has a nominal black point of 600 counts. The mean does rise at extremely high ISO settings. That’s caused by the left side of the histogram clipping. I’ll be reporting on that in the next post.

It looks like this camera holds some interesting secrets.

 

The Last Word

← A book report – page flatness revisited Nikon D5 — dark field histograms at low ISO settings →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    March 29, 2016 at 4:29 pm

    Histogram clipping is one reason to take advantage of isolessness when it’s available…if the histogram is clipped, you can’t run NR and get the true mean of the result.

    On the other hand, that’s only true if the pipeline holds onto negative values until it reaches NR: none of the open-source ones currently do, and I’m pretty sure Adobe does not.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Nikon D5 — dark field histograms vs ISO | The Last Word says:
    March 29, 2016 at 4:28 pm

    […] This is one in a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  2. Nikon D5 — dark field histograms at high ISO settings | The Last Word says:
    March 29, 2016 at 5:01 pm

    […] This is one in a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  3. Nikon D5 — dark-field noise vs shutter speed | The Last Word says:
    March 30, 2016 at 8:28 am

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  4. Nikon D5 — self heating | The Last Word says:
    March 30, 2016 at 10:39 am

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  5. Nikon D5 — first pass overall modeling | The Last Word says:
    March 30, 2016 at 4:19 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  6. Nikon D5 — first pass modeling | The Last Word says:
    March 30, 2016 at 4:21 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  7. Nikon D5 — control layout | The Last Word says:
    March 31, 2016 at 9:46 am

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  8. Nikon D5 — PRNU | The Last Word says:
    April 1, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  9. Nikon D5 — FPRN | The Last Word says:
    April 1, 2016 at 4:44 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  10. Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100/125 images | The Last Word says:
    April 2, 2016 at 2:19 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  11. Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100 images | The Last Word says:
    April 2, 2016 at 2:19 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  12. Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100/160 images | The Last Word says:
    April 2, 2016 at 4:30 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  13. Nikon D5 — photographic dynamic range | The Last Word says:
    April 3, 2016 at 8:47 am

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  14. Nikon D5 — high ISO push processing | The Last Word says:
    April 3, 2016 at 12:19 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  15. Nikon D5 — ultra-high ISO push processing | The Last Word says:
    April 3, 2016 at 2:46 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  16. Nikon D5 — absence of high-ISO spatial filtering | The Last Word says:
    April 3, 2016 at 3:04 pm

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  17. Nikon D5 — EFCS operation | The Last Word says:
    April 4, 2016 at 9:24 am

    […] This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  18. Nikon D5 — what’s going on with the sensor | The Last Word says:
    April 6, 2016 at 8:50 am

    […] Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting […]

    Reply
  19. Nikon D5 — The ISO knob goes to eleven | The Last Word says:
    April 7, 2016 at 9:03 am

    […] Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting […]

    Reply
  20. Nikon D5 — the start of a static AF testing protocol | The Last Word says:
    April 7, 2016 at 5:56 pm

    […] Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting […]

    Reply
  21. Nikon D5 — static AF testing protocol part 2 | The Last Word says:
    April 8, 2016 at 1:00 pm

    […] Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.