• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D5 — static AF testing protocol part 2

Nikon D5 — static AF testing protocol part 2

April 8, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here:

Nikon D5 — read noise vs ISO setting

This is a continuation in the development of a testing protocol for measuring the AF speed of camera/lens combinations with static targets. I swapped the 135/2 DC-Nikkor for a more moderns lens, a Nikon 105/2.8 AF-S G VR macro,As before, I set the AF priority to “Release”.

I changed the illuminant from overhead florescent tubes to Westctt LED panels set to 5000K. That will give me the ability to change illuminant intensity without change its spectrum much.

As I expected, it focused a lot faster:

_D501099

That’s with the time base set to 20 milliseconds per division:

_D501097

Let’s take a closer look:

_D501099-2

So That means the camera is focusing and tripping the shutter in a little more than 100 msec; compare that to about 80 msec for manual focusing.  This was for a starting focus of pretty close to correct, and there was some variation, maybe plus or minus 10 msec for a standard deviation (that’s just eyeballing it).

If the focus is further off at the beginning, it takes the camera longer to focus, in the case below about 20 or 30 msec longer:

_D501101

If it’s way off, it can take 200msec:

_D501103

The D5 still continues to refuse to focus when started some distance from the correct distance and triggered by the Cognisys controller. Sony a7x cameras will focus under those conditions.

However, the camera will trigger the scope from the remote trigger line, as before. Today, I discovered that this only focus when the Cognisys controller is turned on. I think that probably the controller provides a bias signal that the camera shorts out, and that’s what triggers the scope. Will this happen with other Nikon cameras? I don’t know.

Even with the basic test method nailed down, there are a host of variables. Among them:

  • Distance to target
  • Initial focusing distance
  • F-stop (probably will have no influence on DSLRs, but probably will on mirrorless cameras)
  • Target characteristics
  • Illumination

I suppose, if I were a model railroader, I could figure out a way to get a moving target. I do have a shake table. I wonder if that will work.

This testing has the potential to be a huge time sink, and I’m a little scared of it for that reason, but it’s beginning to look feasible.

 

 

The Last Word

← Nikon D5 — the start of a static AF testing protocol Fog across the way, again →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.