• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Showing work

Showing work

September 9, 2014 JimK 1 Comment

Kim Weston is a talented photographer who specializes in nudes.   He offers workshops both in the field and at Wildcat Hill,  his history-rich house and studio, where his grandfather, Edward Weston, lived, worked, and made many of his famous images. Kim had a workshop over the weekend, and asked me to come by to show some of my work to his students after Saturday night dinner.

I jumped at the chance.

Not to sell pictures; I’ve shown work at Kim’s and other workshops and never sold a thing as a result. I think workshops can be a good source of print customers for the photographers who teach them. I’ve been such a print buyer often. However, most people buy prints one a a time, and if you’re going to buy a print from a teacher, you’re probably not going to buy one from anybody else at the same time.

Betterlight_0330
Buttermilk Sunset

For me, there are two strong reasons to show work to a knowledgeable audience.

First, there’s self-expression. For me, the satisfactions of making art are twofold: creating something that feels right, and showing it to someone who appreciates it. The audience has little to do with the creating part. In fact, if you think about the audience much during the art-making, you’ll compromise your art. But the job of being a photographic artist isn’t done until someone sees your work.

Sunset with Contrail
Sunset with Contrail

The Internet is a marvelous medium for getting your work out into the world, but there’s little satisfaction for me unless I know that the work is appreciated. Web traffic logs — at best — count eyeballs, but that’s not enough. I love it when I get emails from people who’ve seen my web galleries and appreciate what I’ve done, but that happens with disappointing frequency.

So the chance to be in the same room with the people seeing my work for the first time, to see their faces, observe their body language, and hear their questions and comments, is precious to me.

Second, there’s a reason to do more work. Some people treat an invitation to show work as nothing more involving than a trip to the boxes or flat files to pick out the prints to bring. If you have that mindset, preparing to show work is a curatorial exercise. For me it’s a chance to revisit a body of work and see if I can improve it.

The most exciting series for just about any photographer is the one they’re currently working on. I’m no different. I’ve been working on writing Matlab code to improve the Timescapes images, and last week I did my best to improve already-captured exposures in that series. I find that the  prospect of an audience energizes me and pushes me to produce. That’s always a good thing.

Betterlight_00189-1
Wind Shear

There’s a downside to my approach to opportunities to show work; the audience just gets to see a silo of your range. Since I’ve already made my peace with zero sales, that’s not costing anything, but it does mean that the audience has no context in which to see the work you’re showing. We all know that no body of work arises in splendid isolation from everything you’ve ever done before, and it would be nice to give viewers the chance to make connections with other series than the one you’re showing.

Maybe next time I’ll do a little curation of some of my other work and show both.

 

The Last Word

← Lightroom memory use vs file size Museum of Monterey opening →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    September 16, 2014 at 6:54 am

    Hey Jim, I’ve been meaning to say this for a while and this post gives me the chance to.

    I like your stuff, I really do – some of it blows my socks off :-). What I find especially appealing is your ability to use technology to produce seemingly non-technical totally artistic results. Kudos!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.