• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 11

Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 11

January 14, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Is an electronic flash fast enough to stop the a7R shutter slap motion? It depends:

All equipment the same as the last post unless noted. Camera shutter release mode: 2 second self-timer, shutter speed: 1/160 second, first curtain synch:

90mm Leica f/2 APO Summicron, f/5.6 with ND filter at minimum absorption, flash duration 1/8000 second (t.1):

min absorb X 90mm cr

90mm Leica f/2 APO Summicron, f/5.6 with ND filter at maximum absorption, flash duration 1/1350 second (t.1):

max absorb X 90mm cr

The image with the longer flash duration is slightly less sharp, even though the flash duration at the longer setting is only 740 microseconds! This still seems odd to me, but is entirely consistent with the differences we were seeing in Sunday’s post using continuous lighting and a focal place shutter speed of the same order, and indicates vibrational frequencies higher than usual for DSLRs.

It occurred to me that there’s a way to determine if some of the vibration that we’re seeing is the result of the second shutter curtain. First make an exposure at 1/160, so that the flash goes off before the second curtain is tripped:

160th

And then make an image at 1/320, or about 3 milliseconds after the second curtain is tripped. This exposure is above the maximum synch speed, so that the top of the picture is dark:

320th

They look virtually the same to me, as do the exposures at 1/200 and 1/250 second. There are some tiny variations in the horizontal line structures, but essentially nothing in the vertical lines, indicating tiny, tiny variations caused by the second curtain, but certainly nothing consequential. The whole experiment shows me that the high-frequency vibrations are essentially all caused by things that happen before the second curtain fires.

As usual, if you want to see the Photoshop files with the images in layers, please contact me.

The Last Word

← Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 10 Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 12 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.