the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 12

Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 12

January 15, 2014 JimK 5 Comments

Ferrell McCullough proposed an idea a couple of days ago that sounded better and better the more I thought about it. Why not do some testing of the strobe-lit images with rear-curtain synch at various shutter speeds? We could then see blur that was big enough to show up during the strobe duration at discrete points after the first curtains fires, and before the second curtain is triggered. In addition to a diagnostic tool, once a safe delay is ascertained for a particular lens/camera/support combination, this could be a way to make studio strobe images with maximum sharpness.

The gear: Leica 135mm f/3.4 APO Telyt on the a7R with a Novoflex adapter, RRS a7 L-bracket, Arca Swiss C1 Cube, RRS TVC-44 legs, camera at a distance from the ISO 12233 target that gave a target height of about 1100 pixels. Release with 2 second self-timer. ISO 100, lens set halfway between f5/6 and f/8. I used a Heliopan variable ND filter to fine tune the exposure.

In order to detect the smallest motion, I needed a long strobe duration. I used a Paul Buff X1600 set for a full dump, which gives a t.1 of 1/600 second. I ran a series of shutter speeds from 1/160 to ¼ second in third-stop increments. 1/160 was the worst, followed by – surprise! – 1/60. 1/125 and 1/100 weren’t bad at all. 1/25 to ¼ produced substantially identical sharpness, indicating that the bulk of the a7R’s high-frequency shutter vibration had damped out in about 40 milliseconds (there could still be lower-frequency resonances that the 1/600 second strobe duration would be fast enough to freeze). The non-monotonic variation of sharpness with shutter speed indicates that there may be some complex resonances involved.

Here are some 2x nearest-neighbor blowups of the usual region of the ISO 12233 target at selected shutter speeds.

¼ second:

4th rear curtain 135mm

1/30 second, the shutter speed where the blur essentially starts:

30th rear curtain 135mm

1/60, one of the worst ones:

60th rear curtain 135mm

And 1/160, the worst one:

160th rear curtain 135mm

But look at 1/80, which isn’t too bad:

80th rear curtain 135mm

Using rear-curtain synch with a shutter speed of around 1/25 second or slower would tame the tripod-mounted a7R shutter shock with lenses under 135mm (and probably much longer), and might be a good plan for hand-held strobe photography with the Sony a7R. It’s hard to get results that are repeatable enough when the camera’s not at a fixed distance from the subject, but I think, as long as the focal lengths and masses are the same as or lower than those of the 135mm Leica APO Telyt,  it’s probably one of those “can’t hurt, might help” things.

The Last Word

← Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 11 Photographic quality →

Comments

  1. Ferrell McCollough says

    January 15, 2014 at 7:27 pm

    Very interesting testing. Am I correct in saying that all of the rear curtain ones are sharper than the front curtain ones in Part 11?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      January 15, 2014 at 8:05 pm

      I think it would take a direct comparison from identical camera position and focus to say that, especially since rear curtain synch and front curtain synch at 1/160 should fire the flash at the same time.

      Reply
    • Jim says

      January 16, 2014 at 7:25 am

      Ferrell, upon further thought, I think, without further experimentation, we can say the following is true:

      At 1/160 front and rear curtain should produce identical results.

      At all speeds longer than 1/160, front curtain synch will produce the same result as at 1/160.

      And, finally, since all rear-curtain results were better than the one at 1/160, all rear curtain results at speeds slower than 1/160 will be better than the front-curtain images at the same shutter speeds.

      All that is assuming that the Sony engineers haven’t thrown us another curve ball that affects this.

      Thanks for the idea.

      Jim

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a7R testing, part 1 | The Last Word says:
    January 3, 2015 at 3:59 pm

    […] A set of photographs showing shutter shock resolution degradation with a 135mm lens is here. Here’s another set showing degradation at 1/500 second. Here’s proof that electronic flash isn’t always fact enough to stop the effects of vibration on a7R images. But trailing curtain synch can help matters. […]

    Reply
  2. Sony A7R: perchè TUTTO è cambiato | Massimo Cristaldi says:
    September 16, 2016 at 2:01 am

    […] Jim Kasson sta studiando, con un’approfondita serie di articoli (l’ultimo, ad oggi è qui), la questione e ha osservato un influsso, soprattutto su lenti lunghe, dello “slap”. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.