• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Simulating motion blur: MTF50 and pictures

Simulating motion blur: MTF50 and pictures

April 22, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Yesterday, I reported on the results on simulations of a Zeiss Otus 55/1.4 at various f-stops, and showed how MTF-50 values translated into picture sharpness with simulated photographs.

Today I’ll do something similar, but varying motion blur instead of f-stop. I set up the sim with the pixel pitch set to 4.88 um (same as a7R or D800 or D810), and a simulated Zeiss Otus lens, at f/5.6. For the motion blur, I assumed constant rate with displacement 1, 1.4, 2, etc pixels at a 45 degree angle, and calculated MTF50 in cycles/picture height.

The MTF50 numbers:

displacement blur

 

Here’s what the full frame would look like:

_DSC1512

 

And here are the simulated 1:1 crops, blown up to 300%:

 

1 pixel blur -- MTF50 = 1516
1 pixel blur — MTF50 = 1516
1.4 pixels blur -- MTF50 = 1443
1.4 pixels blur — MTF50 = 1443
2 pixels blur -- MTF50 = 1331
2 pixels blur — MTF50 = 1331
2.8 pixels blur -- MTF = 1151
2.8 pixels blur — MTF = 1151
4 pixels blur -- MTF50 = 928
4 pixels blur — MTF50 = 928
8 pixels blur -- MTF50 = 506
5.6 pixels blur — MTF50 = 928

 

5.6 pixels blur == MTF50 = 928
8 pixels blur — MTF50 = 506

 

The Last Word

← What’s MTF50 = x look like: sim pix The visibility of a7R shutter shock →

Trackbacks

  1. The visibility of a7R shutter shock | The Last Word says:
    April 23, 2015 at 8:37 am

    […] occurs to me that, with the images from yesterday’s post, we now have a way to, through the magic of simulation, do that very […]

    Reply
  2. A new way to look at depth of field | The Last Word says:
    June 3, 2016 at 8:43 am

    […] With respect to motion blur, I have done some testing to provide a bridge between blur is sensor pixels and MTF50. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.