• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS lens on Sony a7II

Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS lens on Sony a7II

April 9, 2015 JimK 3 Comments

In the previous post, I reported on the performance of the Sony 70-200mm f/4 OSS FE lens on the a7R camera, with and without OSS turned on. In this post, I’d like to present similar results for the same lens on the a7II, with and without in-body image stabilization (IBIS), and with electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS).

Here’s the protocol:

  • RRS L-plate on camera base. This is not the usual way to mount the 70-200, which has its own collar mount, but it’s the way I mounted the a7R, and I didn’t want to make a change.
  • RRS TVC-34 heavy-duty carbon fiber tripod.
  • Arca-Swiss C1 Cube head.
  • Landscape orientation.
  • Lens zoomed to 200mm.
  • No filter.
  • The lighting: a single Fotodiox LED-200WA-56 daylight balanced variable-output flood.
  • ISO set to 1000, f-stop set to f/8.
  • Focusing using single shot autofocus. The focus point is a Siemens star on the target.
  • Drive set to single
  • EFCS on
  • Manual exposure mode.
  • Self-timer set to 2 seconds
  • OSS set to off. On the a7II, this turns off IBIS.
  • Lamp to full, shutter to 1/1000 second, make 16 exposures with new focusing for each, turn the light down a stop, turn the shutter speed down a stop, make 16 exposures… until you get to 1/60 of a second.
  • OSS to on. On the a7II, this turns on IBIS.
  • Repeat exposure sequence.
  • Develop in Lightroom 5.7.1 with standard settings.
  • Crop, export as TIFFs, analyze for horizontal edge MTF50 in Imatest.
  • Export the results to Excel, crunch the stats, and graph.

The first, tripod mounted results (yes, I know you’re not supposed to turn on IBIS/OSS when the camera is on a tripod):

70-200a7iiOSS

The bold lines are the average (aka mean, aka mu) values. The lighter lines are the average value plus and minus the standard deviations (aka sigma). If the statistics are Gaussian, about two thirds of the expected results will lie between the two pair of lighter lines. Orange is OSS on, and blue is OSS off.

Even more so than the a7R, if you’ve got a good solid tripod, you don’t absolutely have to heed Sony’s warning to turn off OSS when you mount the camera on a support.

Now let’s do the whole thing again hand held:

70-200a7iiOSSHH1p1

Whoa! Something terrible is going on at 1/500 second (0.002 second). I checked the firmware level on the camera. 1.10. I upgraded to 1.20 and re-ran the test:

70-200a7iiOSSHH1p2

That makes more sense. The combination of OSS and IBIS (Sony says with an OSS lens mounted to the a7II, the camera will use the OSS for pitch and yaw, and use IBIS for roll, up/down and right/left) helps a tiny bit with the spread but not the mean at 1/1000, helps a bit with the mean at 1/500, helps some with both at 1/250 and 1/125, and really makes a big difference at 1/60.

Note the absolute value differences in the MTF50 scores on the two runs with OSS off. That proves that 16 exposures is not enough to give good solid MTF50 numbers for handheld exposures.

If you’re going to mix OSS and IBIS, update your firmware, folks. I know that Sony doesn’t make it easy, but it does make a difference, at least with the a7II and the 70-200 f/4 lens.

The Last Word

← Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS lens on Sony a7R a7R and a7II camera motion blur compared →

Comments

  1. Christer Almqvist says

    April 10, 2015 at 7:48 am

    QUOTE If you’re going to mix OSS and IBIS, update your firmware, folks. UNQUOTE

    Easier said than done if your Mac runs on OS X 10.10.2

    Reply
  2. Jean Pierre says

    April 11, 2015 at 7:41 am

    Many thanks, for the test, Jim!
    It is not easy, the combination IBIS and OSS!
    It also depends on how I hold the lens forward or behind the lens!
    And, have I put my elbows to the body? How is the “tremor” of each individual, strong or weak? Everyone shakes !!!
    For telephoto lenses, it is very difficult to shoot a sharp image by hand.

    I think a tripod, is the “solution”, when I can not shoot with 1/2000 or higher!

    It will take some time until the technicians of Sony has develope a firmware that works perfectly with the combination IBIS and OSS. At the moment it is still in the “try and error phase”.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. a7R and a7II camera motion blur compared | The Last Word says:
    April 11, 2015 at 9:15 am

    […] days ago, I posted data for the Sony a7R and a7II paired with the Sony 70-200mm f/4 OSS FE lens. I did tests on a tripod and handheld, and with and […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.