• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS lens on Sony a7R

Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS lens on Sony a7R

April 9, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

Rishi Sanyal, one of the reviewers on DPR, mentioned that he was seeing parasitic interaction of Sony a7R shutter shock and optically-stabilized (OSS, in Sony-speak) lenses that meant that users were often better off leaving OSS turned off.

I thought I’d do some testing. I mounted a Sony 70-200mm f/4 OSS FE lens on an a7R, and put the combination through the following protocol:

  • RRS L-plate on camera base. This is not the usual way to mount the 70-200, which has its own collar mount, but has proven to be more resistant to shutter shock than using the collar mount.
  • RRS TVC-34 heavy-duty carbon fiber tripod.
  • Arca-Swiss C1 Cube head.
  • Landscape orientation.
  • Lens zoomed to 200mm
  • No filter.
  • The lighting: a single Fotodiox LED-200WA-56 daylight balanced variable-output flood.
  • ISO set to 1000, f-stop set to f/8.
  • Focusing using single shot autofocus. The focus point is a Siemens star on the target.
  • Drive set to single
  • Manual exposure mode.
  • Self-timer set to 2 seconds
  • OSS set to off
  • Lamp to full, shutter to 1/1000 second, make 16 exposures with new focusing for each, turn the light down a stop, turn the shutter speed down a stop, make 16 exposures… until you get to 1/60 of a second.
  • OSS to on.
  • Repeat exposure sequence.
  • Develop in Lightroom 5.7.1 with standard settings.
  • Crop, export as TIFFs, analyze for horizontal edge MTF50 in Imatest.
  • Export the results to Excel, crunch the stats, and graph.

70-200tripod OSS

Well, OK. Even though Sony says not to use OSS on a tripod, if the tripod is heavy like the RRS TVC-34, it doesn’t make much difference until you get to 1/60 second. Some would argue that it doesn’t make much difference even then.

Now for the interesting part. Let’s do the whole thing over with the camera handheld using the Pete Sousa grip: left palm under base, left fingers bracing the underside of the front part of the lens, elbows against chest. I use my left eye, which gets the camera a little closer to my body.

 

70-200a7ROSS

The bold lines are the average (aka mean, aka mu) values. The lighter lines are the average value plus and minus the standard deviations (aka sigma). If the statistics are Gaussian, about two thirds of the expected results will lie between the two pair of lighter lines. Orange is OSS on, and blue is OSS off.

At 1/1000 second (0.001 second) OSS is helping quite a bit, mostly be reducing the probability of blurring frames. At 1/500, it is helping a tad less. But at 1/250 and 1/60, the average with OSS on is the same as with if off, and at 1/125, it’s actually, on average, worse to have OSS on! Rishi was right. I should point out that the OSS reduces the statistical spread in all cases, though.

The Last Word

← Rules of thumb for handheld shutter speed Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS lens on Sony a7II →

Trackbacks

  1. a7R and a7II camera motion blur compared | The Last Word says:
    April 11, 2015 at 9:14 am

    […] days ago, I posted data for the Sony a7R and a7II paired with the Sony 70-200mm f/4 OSS FE lens. I did tests on a tripod and handheld, and […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.