• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 — dark field histograms

Sony a6300 — dark field histograms

March 12, 2016 JimK 5 Comments

This is part of a long series of posts about the Sony a6300. The series starts here.

I don’t expect any surprises here, since I’ve dealt with a lot of Sony cameras, but you never know, so I looked at the histograms for all the dark field captures that I made for the plots in the previous a6300 posts. I’ll spare you the tedium of going through all of the ISO settings and both semi-mechanical shutter modes, and just post the most interesting ones.

ISO 100, single shot shutter mode:

DSC00001-Full-6024x4024

This is typical Sony raw compressed performance. The camera advertises itself in the EXIF as a 14-bit device, but every other bucket is empty, so it’s only delivering 13 bits of precision.

In continuous mode at the same ISO:

DSC00029-Full-6024x4024

Just like most modern Sony mirrorless cameras, the precision has dropped to 12 bits, and the noise level has risen.

At ISO 320, just before the change of conversion gain, in single shot mode:

DSC00006-Full-6024x4024

At ISO 320, in continuous mode:

DSC00034-Full-6024x4024

Everything looks normal.

At ISO 400, just after the increase in conversion gain, in single shot mode:

DSC00007-Full-6024x4024

And in continuous mode at the same ISO:

DSC00035-Full-6024x4024

As we saw in the graphs, turning up the ISO in this particular case actually lowers the read noise. Nicely played, Sony.

Looking at one of the middle-high ISOs to get a baseline, first in single shot mode:

DSC00015-Full-6024x4024

And now in continuous mode:

DSC00043-Full-6024x4024

There is an odd dropout in the continuous case, but otherwise it’s pretty much what you’d expect.

Taking a big step up in ISO to the point just before the digital low pass filtering starts to take place, first in single shot mode:

DSC00021-Full-6024x4024

And now in continuous mode:

DSC00049-Full-6024x4024

The odd dropout in continuous mode still appears, with a little energy in the blue channel — what’s that about? — but otherwise it’s normal looking.

Now to ISO 12800, where the filtering starts to rear its ugly head. First in single shot mode:

DSC00022-Full-6024x4024

Note that the histogram is no longer Gaussian.

In continuous mode:

DSC00050-Full-6024x4024

Lots of drop outs.

At very high ISO, in single shot mode:

DSC00024-Full-6024x4024

Not even approximately Gaussian, with a very weird, but beautiful in its mathematical symmetry comb effect.

In continuous mode:

DSC00053-Full-6024x4024

We’re basically down to 10 bits here.

It gets even worse as you go higher:

DSC00055-Full-6024x4024

It looks to me like in continuous mode the camera is applying digital gain, causing the dropouts, which then get partially filled back in by the digital  lowpass filtering.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a6300 — read noise vs shutter speed Sony a6300 — self heating →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    March 12, 2016 at 1:28 pm

    About the single shot histogram at ISO 10k: it appears that the raw data is being multiplied by a number that is not a multiple of two. Not hard to figure out which.

    Reply
  2. Max Berlin says

    March 15, 2016 at 7:57 am

    Thanks Jim.

    Was considering the A6300 for video but now I’m out.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      March 15, 2016 at 7:59 am

      Max, I don’t see how you can draw conclusions about video from the dark-field histograms for stills. The processing is completely different. There is no raw video in the a6300.

      Jim

      Reply
      • Max Berlin says

        March 16, 2016 at 7:03 am

        I get it. But a video camera that is worthless for stills means I have to carry another camera. I am trying to simplify and keep the compromises to a minimum.

        Reply
        • Jim says

          March 16, 2016 at 7:06 am

          Why do you say it’s worthless for stills? For an APS-C camera, it’s doing a great job on still image quality, as far as I can tell.

          Jim

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.