the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 — read noise vs shutter speed

Sony a6300 — read noise vs shutter speed

March 11, 2016 By JimK Leave a Comment

This is part of a long series of posts about the Sony a6300. The series starts here.

We’ve looked at how the a6300 read noise varies with ISO setting, and found evidence not only of a good thing: conversion gain switching, but of a bad thing — at least I consider it a bad thing — high ISO low-pass filtering.

Do some shutter speeds provide an excuse for the camera to do other kinds of digital filtering? I did a dark-field series at all timed shutter speed the camera allows to be set at ISO 100 and ISO 400. I used single shot shutter mode, with long exposure noise reduction off.

At ISO 100:

iso100shutter std

It’s pretty obvious that there’s something happening at the transition from 2.5 to 3.2 seconds. The noise drops by about three-quarters of a stop at that point.

ISO 400:

iso400shutter std

The transition takes place at the same place. As you’d expect, the noise levels are higher.

Let’s look at the red raw channel in the frequency domain, first at ISO 100:

ssiso100-2sec

The vertical frequency response is flat. The horizontal is not. We’ve seen this behavior in the alpha 7 series, too.

Let’s see what happens at 4 seconds:

ssiso100-4sec

Oh, yeah. It’s pretty obvious that Sony is doing some low-pass filtering from 3.2 seconds on up. Yuk.

Since I had all the samples, I took a look to see if there was anything untoward going on with the black points vs shutter speed.

iso100shutter mean

Doesn’t seem to be affected at all by shutter speed.

At ISO 400:

iso400shutter mean

That looks good, too.

← Sony a6300 — taming the EVF/LCD switching Sony a6300 — dark field histograms →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Sony 135 mm STF on GFX 50R
  • Alexander Häggström on Sony 135 mm STF on GFX 50R
  • Mike King on Metabones 1.26x Expander on GFX 100 with Otus 55
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors
  • Barry Benowitz on Diffraction and sensors
  • Raymond on Fuji 45-100/4, 100-200/5.6 on GFX 100
  • CarVac on Diffraction and sensors
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Diffraction and sensors
  • CarVac on Diffraction and sensors
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.