• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7II uncompressed raw dark-field histograms

Sony a7II uncompressed raw dark-field histograms

November 18, 2015 JimK 4 Comments

Sony posted the Release 2.0 firmware for the a7II yesterday. Among other things, the release makes uncompressed raw an option.

I did a set of dark-field histograms with no lens attached, the shutter set to 1/2000 second, and the drive mode to single shot. at all ISO settings.  I’m posting all the whole stop ones and certain others that are interesting to me.

ISO 100. All 14 bits present. Pretty tight standard deviation.
ISO 100. All 14 bits present. Pretty tight standard deviation.
ISO 200. Just about what you'd expect.
ISO 200. Just about what you’d expect.
ISO 300. Again, this is textbook.
ISO 300. Again, this is textbook.
ISO 800. Still looking normal.
ISO 800. Still looking normal, except for those empty buckets. What’s that about?
ISO 1600.
ISO 1600. Now we’re seeing a lot of depopulation.
ISO 2000.
ISO 2000.  The red channel and one of the green channels are showing a combing effect that I associate with digital processing that has gain less than one. However, the other two channels have none of the abnormally-high buckets.
ISO 2500.
ISO 2500. The effect in the upper two channels is diminishing.
ISO 3200.
ISO 3200. The doubled-up hitogram buckets are gone, but the blue and the lower green channels are not really 14 bits of precision.
ISO 3000.
ISO 4000. Like ISO 3200.
ISO 5000.
ISO 5000. Now the precision of the top two channels is about 13 bits, and that of the bottom two about 12 bits.
ISO 6400.
ISO 6400. Similar to ISO 5000.
ISO 8000.
ISO 8000. The top two channels have about 12 bits of precision, nd the bottom two about 11 bits.
ISO 12800.
ISO 12800. The top two channels are quantized at about 12 bits, and the bottom two at about 10 bits.
ISO 1600.
ISO 16000. A lot like 12800.
ISO 20000.
ISO 20000. We’ve lot a bit in the upper two channels.
ISO 25600.
ISO 25600.  Similar to ISO 20000.

This is all very interesting, especially the difference between the channels. But I don’t think any of this will affect images. It appears that there’s enough read noise to provide plenty of dither as the effective precision drops with increasing ISO.

The Last Word

← Covering your tracks Sony a7II uncompressed read noise and EDR →

Comments

  1. N/A says

    November 19, 2015 at 6:37 am

    A7R2,

    for exampe ISO25600 – different parameters to shot dark frame – different green channels histograms… did you see that ?

    1) https://www.dropbox.com/s/6zioex20zl2qcmq/Screenshot%202015-11-19%2013.29.04.png?dl=0

    2) http://s18.postimg.org/pqkqrx89l/DSC09815_Sel_4119_2789_366x339.png

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a7II uncompressed read noise and EDR | The Last Word says:
    November 19, 2015 at 3:43 pm

    […] I posted some dark-field histograms from the a7II at various ISO settings with the new uncompressed raw mode …. Today I’ll show you what the read noise from those images looks like, and how it compares to […]

    Reply
  2. Sony a7RII FW 2.0 raw dark-field histograms, ISO 100-1600 | The Last Word says:
    November 21, 2015 at 8:54 am

    […] few days ago I posted dark-field histograms from uncompressed files made with version 2 firmware running on the Sony a7II. Yesterday, I posted compressed and uncompressed read noise and engineering dynamic range plots for […]

    Reply
  3. Sony a7RII FW 2.0 raw dark-field histograms, ISO 1600 and up | The Last Word says:
    November 21, 2015 at 9:14 am

    […] few days ago I posted dark-field histograms from uncompressed files made with version 2 firmware running on the Sony a7II. Yesterday, I posted compressed and uncompressed read noise and engineering dynamic range plots for […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.