• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Leica 24mm f/3.8 sun stars

Leica 24mm f/3.8 sun stars

December 14, 2013 JimK 3 Comments

I went for a walk this  morning, and I decided to play with sun stars — that’s the effect you get when you get the sun, or part of the sun, in the image at a small aperture. The sun’s rays striking the diaphragm leaves cause radial spikes of light. If you’re going for part of the sun’s disk, it’s something that is hit-and-miss with an SLR; first, because your finger gets tired holding the DOF preview button down all the time, and second because the sensor and your eyes see bright light differently. Without a lot of luck, it’s impossible with a rangefinder camera; the difference in location between the finder and the lens means that they see the sun very differently, and, besides, there are no diaphragm blades in the finder’s optical system.

With an EVF camera, particularly one with a great finder like the a7R, it’s a piece of cake. I used the Leica 24mm f/3.8 Elmar, set to f/11 at ISO 1000. Here’s an unmanipulated sample with just the tiniest part of the sun  not occluded:

_DSC2036-3

After these heroic adjustments in Lightroom:

Lr adj

The image looks like this:

_DSC2036

The JPEG compression and reducing the size for the web just ruins the star. Here it is at 1:1:

_DSC2036-4

 

The center (shown here at 1:1) is pretty sharp, but diffraction has taken its toll:

_DSC2036-2

What really impresses are the corners, which are shown here at 1:1 with 1 2/3 EV exposure push so you can see the details:

Upper left:

_DSC2036 UL

Lower left:

_DSC2036LL

Lower right:

_DSC2036 LR

Upper right:

_DSC2036 UR

There’s a fair amount of noise — ISO 1000, big shadow move, and extra + 1.67 EV for visibility — ans some corner smear is evident, but the image isn’t half bad. I’ve not corrected for either falloff or color shading towards the corners.

The Last Word

← E mount lens on an FE camera Leica 24mm f/3.8 on a7R →

Comments

  1. beeg says

    November 6, 2019 at 8:23 am

    thank you for this article. I appreciate your work very much. At last I had to buy the Loxia m and asking myself now whether there is any risk to burn the sensor of my A7RII by taking a shot on a tripod holding the cam directly into the sun. And one more question: Is quality of sunstars better (=sharper) with shorter exposure? Thank you. With best regards.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 6, 2019 at 8:59 am

      It is possible to damage the sensor, but at the f-stops that produce the best sun stars, I think it is unlikely. Try to minimize the time the sun is focused at one point in the frame, however. Exposure duration has no effect on sunstars, within reason.

      Reply
  2. homemade says

    December 15, 2019 at 1:39 pm

    Let me chime in from the other side ?? I want my lenses to render point light sources as points, not as friggin huge stars. To me, this is purely an effect, like the aperture flares that are sometimes intentionally added because they remind people of Hollywood movies. If I wanted an effect, I d prefer to use an effect filter or add it in post. I think it s weird that one point light source gets rendered decidedly un-pointy effect coma is treated as a defect, but sunstars are considered a feature.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.