• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Adobe Flat Field & the a7R

Adobe Flat Field & the a7R

December 18, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

A while back in the a7R testing, I said I’d ordered a diffuser and would test the Adobe Flat Field interleaved workflow when it arrived. The expodisc came yesterday, so here goes.

To review the bidding, Adobe Flat Field (let’s call it AFF) is a beta plug-in for Lightroom. The purpose of the program is to correct for color casts and light falloff such as occurs when you use short M-mount lenses on the a7R. It has two modes of operation. You can point the plug-in at the images to be corrected, and give it a reference image of an evenly illuminated field made with the same lens, focusing distance, and aperture. It will produce copies of all the images that need correction with just the color casts removed, or with both the color casts and the light falloff corrected. In this mode, the plugin works a lot like Cornerfix. To use either program in this mode on a7R images made with third-party lenses requires field record-keeping to know which reference image to point the program at, which I find onerous. The metadata won’t help you, since the third-party lenses and the a7R can’t talk to each other.

There’s another mode of AFF operation that intrigues me. It’s called interleaved mode. To use it, you precede each set of images taken with a particular lens at a particular distance and aperture with a reference image. You can point AFF at as many sets of images to be corrected and reference images as you wish, and it will process them all as a batch, identifying applying the reference images and the images to be corrected by content, and using to former to fix the latter.

In order to make this process convenient in the field you need a quick way to make the reference images. That’s where expodisc comes in. It is a flat white diffuser, and you make the reference pictures by putting it in front of the lens and making an exposure. The one I have is in a 77mm filter mount, and you can use it on lenses with smaller filter rings by just holding it in front of the lens. The manufacturer intends that you do that, and supplies a lanyard that attaches to the disc. You can hang the lanyard around your neck like the old Weston Master II exposure meter, and it’s always handy.

I attached one of my troublesome lenses – the Zeiss Biogon ZM 35mm f/2 – to the a7R with a Metabones adapter and went out into the yard. I made handheld reference and real images at f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, and f/8. I set the shutter slow by two stops for the reference images that I fed AFF, but not for the ones that I’ll show you in this post.

I brought all the images into Lightroom, and exported the images to be corrected and the reference images as DNG files. AFF won’t work on proprietary raw files, which I understand, and it won’t automatically convert the proprietary filed to SNG, which I don’t – to be fair, it is beta software. Then I invoked AFF from the bottom of the Library menu. It crunched numbers for a while and after a minute or so, it presented me with corrected versions of all the real images, identified as such. These were new DNG files; it didn’t touch the old ones.

I found the process in the field to be quick and easy. I looked at the reference images, and they looked at least as good, and probably better, than the similar images I had laboriously made earlier.

At f/2.8, here’s the picture through the ExpoDisc:

Z35a7mask28

The uncorrected image:

Z35a7uncorr28

The corrected image:

Z35a7corr28

Works fine. However, this is one of those “be careful what you wish for” situations; the corners are now esthetically too light, although they’re probably photogrammetrically right. That’s easy to fix with the Lightroom vignetting tool.

At f/4, here’s the picture through the ExpoDisc:

Z35a7mask4

The uncorrected image:

Z35a7uncorr4

The corrected image:

Z35a7corr4

At f/5.6, here’s the picture through the ExpoDisc:

Z35a7mask56

The uncorrected image:

Z35a7uncorr56

The corrected image:

Z35a7corr56

At f/8, here’s the picture through the ExpoDisc:

Z35a7mask8

The uncorrected image:

Z35a7uncorr8

The corrected image:

Z35a7corr8

The Last Word

← Lens adapter tolerance, part 2 Zeiss 35mm on a7R →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.