• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7R post-push pictures

Sony a7R post-push pictures

December 8, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

Many people look at graphs like those in the last post, nod their heads, but don’t really believe the results. If you’re one of those people, read on. You’ll have actual photographs to look at.

I went with my favorite subject for noise testing, my bookcase. Usually, I use a 35mm lens on a full frame camera for this test, but for several reasons, I chose a 60mm lens today. The first is the 35mm lens needs a vertical orientation for this subject, and I don’t have a convenient way to make verticals yet with this camera. The second reason is that I suspect that a 35mm lens could have issues with corner smearing and color shifts with the a7R, and I’m not ready to deal with that yet (although I promise to delve into it late). The last reason is that I really wanted to see how the Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 did on the Sony body.

On that last point, I was not disappointed. It may be that the Coastal Optical lens and the a7R is a marriage made in heaven. This was my first chance to look at a real picture made by the Sony, and it did not disappoint.

I put the camera on a tripod, aimed it at the bookcase, set the shutter to .4 second, the f-stop to f/8, the ISO to 3200, the self-timer to 10 seconds, and banged of an exposure which showed a nice ETTRish histogram. Varying nothing but the ISO setting, I made five more exposures at ISO 1500, 800, 400, 200, and 100.

I downloaded Lightroom 5,3 RC from the Adobe Labs web site, installed it, imported the images, white balanced to daylight, and set the Exposure control on the ISO 100 image to +5, the Exposure control on the ISO 200 image to +4, the Exposure control on the ISO 400 image to +3, the Exposure control on the ISO 800 image to +2, the Exposure control on the ISO 1600 image to +1, and didn’t adjust the Exposure of the ISO 3200 image. I left all the other settings at the default values.

Here are the results:

ISO 100:

_DSC1750

ISO 200:

_DSC1749

ISO 400:

_DSC1748

ISO 800:

_DSC1747

ISO 1600:

_DSC1746

ISO 3200:

_DSC1745

They all look pretty similar. Now, let’s zoom in to 1:1:

ISO 100:

bookcase a7r 100c

ISO 200:

bookcase a7r 200cr

ISO 400:

bookcase a7r 400 cr

ISO 800:

bookcase a7r 800cr

ISO 1600:

bookcase a7r 1600 cr

ISO 3200:

bookcase a7r 3200 cr

Still pretty similar, huh. We’ll look closer in the next post.

The Last Word

← Is the Sony a7R ISOless? Sony a7R post-push closeups →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.