the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7R post-push closeups

Sony a7R post-push closeups

December 8, 2013 JimK 3 Comments

I zoomed in even further on the images from the preceding post, and doubled the size in both directions using nearest neighbor, so that single pixels become 2×2 blocks.

ISO 100:

bookcase a7r 100 2x cr

ISO 200:

bookcase a7r 200 2x cr

ISO 400:

bookcase a7r 4002x cr

ISO 800:

bookcase a7r 800 2x cr

ISO 1600:

bookcase a7r 1600 2x cr

ISO 3200:

bookcase a7r 3200 2x cr

If I get picky, I can say that the noise in the ISO 100 image, the one pushed by five stops, is a tad worse than the others.

This is a good example of an “ISO-less” camera.

Note: because of haste on my part in the first place, and laziness now, the images in this post, and several posts in this series, are in the ProPhotoRGB color space. They won’t look right unless you have  a color-managed browser.  Not sure if you do?  Take this simple test.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7R post-push pictures Sony a7R SNR testing analmoly →

Comments

  1. Herb Sennet says

    December 8, 2013 at 2:08 pm

    Jim, very nice to see this!
    I posted similar results earlier today here:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/leicasonyzeiss/

    with kind regards,
    Herb

    Reply
  2. Andrew Z says

    December 13, 2013 at 5:15 am

    Looks like there is a lot more red in the black book at iso 100. I suspect its not there at ISO1600 due to sony doing some chromo noise reduction on the raw. Are there embedded colour profiles as it displays very differently in my browser compared to any other programme?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      December 13, 2013 at 6:12 am

      Andrew, these photos are all in ProPhoto RGB, and are tagged. You’ll need a color-managed browser to see them properly. My bad; I should have converted them to sRGB. I’ll make a note in the post itself.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.