• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII current — EVF, LCD, neither

Sony a7RII current — EVF, LCD, neither

November 4, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here.

Yesterday, at the end of a post about my battery current testing methodology, I showed you my new technique for relatively high-speed dynamic measurements. Today, I’ll show you what happened when I took the new method out for a spin. 

Here is the current (vertical axis) vs time (horizontal axis, 10 milliseconds per division) with neither the EVF nor the LCD on. I got to this state by manually enabling the EVF, and not placing anything that might block light near the eyepiece.

evf-no-eye

We see the camera doing something — probably reading live view data out of the sensor — every 30 milliseconds.

Here’s what happens to the current under the same conditions, but when the camera thinks it’s being held to the eye:

evf-eye

 

The minimum current flow increases somewhat, the period of the cycles drops in half to 15 msec, and the maximum current is drawn for a longer period of time. It looks like the camera is reading out data twice as fast, and it’s lengthening the time of higher current draw so that it can refresh the EVF.

Here’s the current with the situation as above, but with the shutter release half-depressed:

evf-eye-depress

No change. Why am I showing you this? It will all be clear shortly.

Now, let’s turn the LCD display on and the EVF off, and lok at what the current draw is with no finger on the shutter release:

lcd-no-depress

It looks like the current with both displays off, but with a longer period of maximum current draw. I’m thinking this increase occurs because the LCD display is being refreshed (at 30 fps). 

Now let’s see what happens when the shutter button is half-depressed:

lcd-depress

That looks a heck of a lot like the current when the EVF is on and the shutter button is half depressed (and also like the current when the EVF is on and the shutter button is not depressed). It looks like the refresh rate is 60 fps.

Thus, there are three high average-current states:

  • EVF on, eye to finder, shutter button not depressed
  • EVF on, eye to finder, shutter button half depressed
  • LCD on, shutter button half depressed

The moderate average-current state is: 

  • LCD on, shutter button not depressed

And the lowest current state is: 

  • EVF on, eye away from finder, shutter button not depressed

So it is not exactly accurate to say that the camera draws more power with the EVF on than with the LCD on, although in a typical usage scenario that might well be the case.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII current draw test methodology Autofocus and Sony a7RII battery life →

Trackbacks

  1. Dynamic Sony a7RII battery draw says:
    November 5, 2016 at 1:58 pm

    […] I now realize that things are a lot more complicated than in indicated above. You can read about that here. […]

    Reply
  2. Sony a7RII battery draw — summary says:
    November 10, 2016 at 9:58 am

    […] Whether using the EVF or using the LCD uses more power depends on the shooting circumstances. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.