• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII FW 3.3 raw dark-field histograms, ISO 3200-25600

Sony a7RII FW 3.3 raw dark-field histograms, ISO 3200-25600

December 2, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

Yesterday, I showed you histograms of raw dark-field images from the Sony a7RII with release 3.30 firmware with ISO’s between 100 and 1600. The red and blue channels looked pretty similar to the FW 1.0 images I made last year. However, the green channels did not. The uncompressed green channels were more ragged, and the compressed ones evidenced 12-bit precision, not the 13-bit results that we saw with the red and blue channels under FW 3.3, and all the channels under FW 1.0.

Today, we’ll look at the dark-field histograms from 3200 to 25600.

We find that the 12-bit precision of the green channels continues in general, but there are parts of the histogram where, if the read noise is big enough, we get 13-bit precision. This may be due to raw image processing, but it’s not spatial filtering, THe curves are flat all the way up the ISO scale to 25600:

uc1600spec

uc25600spec

And now, with no further ado, and with minimal commentary, here are the histograms:

ISO 3200, uncompressed
ISO 3200, uncompressed
ISO 3200, compressed
ISO 3200, compressed
ISO 6400, uncompressed
ISO 6400, uncompressed
ISO 6400, compressed
ISO 6400, compressed
ISO 10000, uncompressed
ISO 10000, uncompressed
ISO 10000, compressed
ISO 10000, compressed
ISO 12800, uncompressed
ISO 12800, uncompressed
ISO 12800, compressed
ISO 12800, compressed
ISO 16000, uncompressed
ISO 16000, uncompressed
ISO 16000, compressed
ISO 16000, compressed
ISO 20000, uncompressed
ISO 20000, uncompressed
ISO 20000, compressed
ISO 20000, compressed
ISO 25800, uncompressed
ISO 25800, uncompressed
ISO 25800, compressed
ISO 25800, compressed

 

.

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII FW 3.3 raw dark-field histograms, ISO 100-1600 More slit scan experimants — parallel processing →

Comments

  1. Fox says

    December 3, 2016 at 3:13 am

    Hi Jim,

    First of all, I would like to thank you for doing all the detailed test for a7r ii. I just placed an order for landscape photography and I do quite some nightscape/astrophoto so I was drawn to your blogs. Could you provide you opinion about the dark current more in the perspective of practical usage in the dark? Like if what would you do to take a 25s 3200 ISO photo of milkyway?

    Thanks
    Fox

    Reply
    • Jim says

      December 3, 2016 at 7:19 am

      I think the diffuse portions would be fine, as would the very bright stars. You might lose some of the dimmer individual stars.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.