• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII maximum continuous frame rates

Sony a7RII maximum continuous frame rates

October 16, 2016 JimK 8 Comments

I’m going to be doing some synthetic slit scans with the Sony a7RII, and I needed to figure out what frame rate the camera could sustain on a continuous basis, so I did some testing. Thinking that others might be interested in the results, I’m sharing them here.

Test conditions

  • Sony a7RII
  • Lexar Professional 1000X (150 MB/s) 256 GB SD card
  • Silent shutter on (as it turns out, this doesn’t make any difference).
  • ISO 100 (no noise reduction)
  • 1/500 second (no noise reduction)
  • Manual exposure mode
  • Manual focus mode
  • Single shot shutter mode
  • Autoreview off
  • Nikon 200/2G VR I lens
  • Vello smart adapter
  • Sony AC power supply
  • JJC wired intervalometer

The results

  • Full Frame, Raw, uncompressed: 4 seconds between exposures is the fastest rate with no missed exposures
  • Full Frame, Raw, compressed: 3 seconds
  • Full Frame, JPEG, Extra Fine: 2 seconds
  • Full Frame, JPEG, Fine: 2 seconds
  • APS-C, Raw, uncompressed: 2 seconds
  • APS-C, Raw, compressed: 2 seconds
  • APS-C, JPEG, Extra Fine: 2 seconds
  • APS-C, JPEG, Fine: 1 second

Notes

The intervalometer’s setting precision is 1 second, so in some cases, the camera can easily obtain the rates above, and on others it can barely get there. For large file sizes, the camera appears to be limited by the speed with which it can write to the SD card. The maximum write speed of the card I used is substantially above the a7RII’s USB-2 write speed, so any fast card should yield the same results.

[Added 10/17: I’ve been asked how many shots until the first miss with full-frame, compressed raw.

  • 1 second gets you 102 shots.
  • 2 second gets you 243 shots.

These numbers aren’t particularly repeatable.]

I did the testing with a Vello adapter and a Nikon 200/2 VRI lens. I noticed that silent shutter didn’t mean silent operation. I listened closely and discovered that the diaphragm stopping down on the Nikon 200/2 makes a fair amount of noise. I’d never noticed that before, since, when used with a DSLR or with the a7x cameras in EFCS mode, the sound of the lens is masked by the sound of the camera’ shutter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Last Word

← And the winner is… A book report — Semis & ISBNs →

Comments

  1. David Braddon-Mitchell says

    October 17, 2016 at 3:12 am

    Huh. Useful info for the more mundane purpose of time lapse…thanks.

    Reply
  2. David Braddon-Mitchell says

    October 17, 2016 at 3:15 am

    Hi Jim

    I’ve noticed that by default leaving a comment results in an email asking you to confirm that you want an email update about further comments. While that’s much better than just auto updating, it would be better still if there was a check box when you leave a comment that opts out of ‘subscribing’

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 14, 2016 at 8:00 am

      David, thanks for telling me about that. It must have gotten broken as part of the change in themes. I think it’s fixed now.

      Reply
  3. Simeon says

    November 14, 2016 at 1:09 am

    But you have to take in mind that the SD card slot of this camera is UHS-I only which means that the card you were using can write half of its speed tops. 150mb/s will get under 75mb/s.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 14, 2016 at 7:56 am

      That is very likely a big component of the explanation for why the camera behaves the way it does. There is a point, and it arrives pretty soon these days, where you are wasting your money to buy fast flash cards with these cameras. I buy them anyway, in hope of improvements in the near future.

      Reply
      • Simeon says

        November 14, 2016 at 9:53 am

        The UHS-I standard is physically different therefore I doubt that there will be improvement with UHS-II cards. The best card for you will be Sandisk UHS-I the fastest model. I Like Samsung cards but Sony did not add them in the firmware maybe and I can not write 4K 100mbit on them despite that they are way over the needed speeds for the job. Sony Sd cards are crap :), I have one and the camera behaves strangely with it and not only A7rII, the A7r and A6300 did that too.

        Reply
        • Jim says

          November 14, 2016 at 9:56 am

          The UHS-I standard is physically different therefore I doubt that there will be improvement with UHS-II cards.

          I meant with the next-generation alpha cameras.

          Reply
          • Simeon says

            November 15, 2016 at 12:56 am

            Ooo I am hoping that there will be two UHS-II card slots 🙂

            Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.