• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7S read noise vs ISO

Sony a7S read noise vs ISO

July 6, 2014 JimK 1 Comment

I’m been showing you histograms of the Sony alpha 7S when making images of the back of the lens cap. We saw some evidence that the chip and/or raw processing was different at different ISOs. I suspect it’s the chip, at moderate ISOs, and processing at nosebleed ones.

To get a better look, I measured the standard deviation of the dark noise at 1/8000 second with the drive in single shot mode varying the ISO setting in 1/3 stop intervals:

RNvsISOSS

There are three departures from the monotonically increasing straight line that ISO-less cameras exhibit.

First, below ISO 100 the read noise does not fall. This is entirely normal and expected. ISO 100 is the base ISO of the camera, and ISO settings below that should not normally be used.

Second, the noise drops more than one stop between ISO 1600 and ISO 2000. This is probably the result of a deliberate change to the conversion gain, and it is one of the things that make the a7S so good at high ISOs.

Third, there is a much smaller drop just before ISO 100K. That is the result of changes to the raw processing.

I have not seen any other’s report the lack of monotonicity versus ISO of the a7S read noise. I’d appreciate pointers to other’s conclusions on this subject.

Also note that the read noise never falls below 14 stops from clipping. I have seen reports of a7S read noise of less than that.

We know that the camera behaves differently with the drive mode set to continuous, so it makes sense to run the curves again for that condition:

rnvsISOC

The curves have kinks in about the same places. The low-ISO read noise is about a stop worse in continuous mode, which you’d expect since we lose a bit in that mode.

Here’s what the read noise looks like in single shot silent mode:

rnvsISOSilent

There are no points for ISOs below 100, because they are not allowed in silent mode. There’s nothing surprising here.

The Last Word

← Sony a7S self heating Sony a7S read noise vs shutter speed. →

Comments

  1. Dr. Georg Ramsauer says

    May 19, 2018 at 10:02 pm

    I use my Sony Alpha 7s very often in my job as private investigator.
    Low-light abilities are incredible.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.