• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Max in-camera ISO for the Sony a7

Max in-camera ISO for the Sony a7

February 24, 2014 JimK 6 Comments

ETTR is only a useful exposure strategy at base ISO for ISOless cameras like the a7. What’s the maximum ISO you should use on the a7? There are three ways that I know to find out.

The first is to minimize read noise as referred to the input of the pre-ADC amplifier. If you’re trying to do that, turning up the ISO in the a7 past 1600 or so is fruitless.

The second is to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio in the lower parts of the midrange or the brighter parts of the shadows. If that’s your goal, you may be just as happy gluing your ISO knob to 100.

The third is to look at the Unity Gain ISO, and not use ISOs more than a stop or two over. Since the 13-bit ISOug of the a7 is about 1000, 2000 or 4000 should be your top ISO.

Here’s what I do: I give myself a stop or two extra headroom if I don’t have enough light to do ETTR at base ISO. After that, I increase the ISO as necessary to maintain that headroom until I get to 1600. That way my finder, which I usually leave in normal (non-automatic gain control) mode, doesn’t get too dim to use.

The Last Word

← 135 Telyt on M240, 135 APO-Sonnar on Sony a7 Sony a7, M240 with 135 APO-Sonnar →

Comments

  1. Jerry Fusselman says

    May 3, 2014 at 11:51 am

    I don’t exactly understand your phrase “I give myself a stop or two extra headroom.” Can you explain what you mean in operational details?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 3, 2014 at 12:04 pm

      Jerry, by that I mean I let the histogram slide to the left for a stop or two before I touch the ISO control. “Underexposure” gives more room for bright objects that affect the right side of the histogram — thus, more “headroom”.

      Jim

      Reply
  2. Jerry Fusselman says

    May 3, 2014 at 12:31 pm

    Thanks! Let’s see if I can restate (in slow-motion reasoning) your standard way decently well: You’re in manual mode with manual ISO. You want ISO 100 whenever possible, so you try it first. You set aperture and shutter speed hoping to be consistent with ETTR. The result of a perfect ETTR, when conditions allow it, is generally considered overexposure by the camera.

    If you cannot achieve ETTR with your desired aperture and shutter speed, then you are willing to expose within a stop or two below the ETTR and keep ISO at 100 (or whatever the base is). If there is no better term, let’s call this “middle exposure.”

    If you would get an exposure below middle exposure at your desired aperture and shutter speed, then (and I’m guessing now) you keep shooting a middle exposure, but now at a higher ISO.

    However, if that ISO would be above 1600, then you shoot at 1600 anyway and deal with the underexposure in post processing.

    Do I understand?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 3, 2014 at 12:33 pm

      “Do I understand?”

      Perfectly. You said it better than I.

      Jim

      Reply
  3. Jerry Fusselman says

    May 3, 2014 at 12:55 pm

    Thanks, though I feel I was rather long winded.

    I just today discovered your blog, I am hoping to read as much as I can this weekend about the a7r. Thanks for such a terrific resource!

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. A7S ETTR - The GetDPI Photography Forums says:
    August 5, 2014 at 12:55 pm

    […] Re: A7S ETTR Found Max in-camera ISO for the Sony a7 | The Last Word […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.