• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Testing the Zony 55 with the ISO 12233 target

Testing the Zony 55 with the ISO 12233 target

February 3, 2014 JimK 1 Comment

I’ve had some interest in going back and looking at the Sony/Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar (from now on called the Zony 55) on the Sony a7R. I am happy to oblige. I’ve changed the test regime a tiny bit. Rather than use a variable neutral density filter to adjust the light levels at the sensor so that I can use a constant f-stop and ISO setting across the range of shutter speeds, I’m using the variable output feature of the Fotodiox LED-200WA-56. The only downside is that the steps in brightness get fairly large when the lamp is dim, so that I can’t get 1/3 stop steps with long shutter speeds. That hasn’t been very useful anyway.

I set up this gear: Zony 55 on a Sony alpha 7R, RRS a7 L-bracket, Arca Swiss C1 Cube, RRS TVC-44 legs. Release was with the 2 second self-timer.  ISO 100, lens set at f/5.6. ISO 12233 target with the camera at a distance to yield an active area 710 pixels high. Thus, the lines labeled “7” represent 1 line pair per pixel pair.

I focused manually, wide open using the a7R’s most magnified live view setting. I’ll say it one more time: the a7R’s live view is a joy to use, and the focus-by-wire capability of the Zony 55 provides for the most precise and accurate focusing I’ve experienced.

Target illumination for the continuous lighting images was provided by a single Fotodiox LED-200WA-56 lamp using the supplied reflector. Lighting for the strobe images came from a Paul Buff Einstein 640 watt-second flash set to 2.5 watt-seconds. At this power setting, the flash duration is about 1/13000 second. The camera was set to trailing curtain synch and the shutter to 3.2 seconds, allowing the camera to stabilize from the shock of the first curtain movement before the flash went off.

For the continuous-lighting pictures, the camera was set to 1/500 second with the Fotodiox at maximum output. An exposure was made. Then the shutter was set 1/3 stop slower, the light adjusted to give the same meter reading, and another exposure effected. That process was repeated all the way to a shutter speed of 1/5 second, with some gaps where the Fotodiox brightness steps were over 1/3 stop.

I processed the images in Lightroom with the default settings, corrected for (minor, as it turns out) exposure differences, and exported the files to Lightroom as layers. I labeled the layers with the exposure times and compared them. The images that I’m posting here are crops from the upper right-hand corner, enlarged 3x using nearest neighbor, and JPEG’d. Because of the way that Photoshop handles EXIF data from images composed of multiple layers, the EXIF data for the posted images is bogus. If anyone would like to see the Photoshop stack, please contact me.

The strobe image is the sharpest. Note the high contrast in the areas labeled with the 7, where there is one line pair per pixel pair. This is one sharp lens:

a7r 55 Zony strobe

The 1/500 image is as sharp for the horizontal lines, but the vertical lines are slightly blurred:

a7r 55 Zony 500th

1/400 is a little worse, but 1/320 is actually slightly better than 1/500. 1/250 is about the same as 1/500. 1/200 is about the same as 1/400.

At 1/160, things take a bad turn, and there’s degradation in the horizontal lines as well as the vertical ones:

a7r 55 Zony 160th

Things remain about the same until 1/80, which is the worst performing shutter speed. Even at 1/80 there is enough contrast at the sensel pitch to cause false color artifacts:

a7r 55 Zony 80th

As the shutter speeds get slower from 1/80, there is gradual improvement. It looks like this at 1/5.

a7r 55 Zony 5th

Bottom line? Yes, there is shutter-shock degradation with the Sony 55 even on a sturdy set of carbon fiber legs and a good head. It’s not terrible, though. If the Zony weren’t such a sharp lens, it would be hard to see.

All these images were made in Landscape mode. In portrait orientation, things get quite a bit worse.

The Last Word

← Ameliorating Sony a7R shutter shock Is exposure important for ISO 12233 testing? →

Comments

  1. Ferrell McCollough says

    February 3, 2014 at 6:34 pm

    Excellent!
    It looks like 1/80 – 1/160 sec. is good to avoid when the utmost sharpness is desired. Thank you for this work and many, many of the previous posts. Well done!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.