• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Ameliorating Sony a7R shutter shock

Ameliorating Sony a7R shutter shock

February 2, 2014 JimK 1 Comment

Joe Holmes just posted a good article on how to deal with the Sony alpha 7R shutter vibrations.

Joe has gone to a lot of trouble and applied some really inventive thinking to come up with his fixes.  His glass is fuller than mine in that he sees acceptable results as reachable over a broader range of lenses and shutter speeds than I do, Still, his ideas should help under almost any circumstances.

How  could two careful testers come to (slightly) different conclusions? Although our thinking is alike, we’re using different methods, lenses, and somewhat different implementations, with Joe’s fixes being more sophisticated and probably more effective than mine. There’s a difference in emphasis in our work; I’m trying mainly to analyze the problem, and Joe’s concentrating most of his efforts on fixing it.  However, beyond that I think there are two reasons why we’re looking a bit differently at how successful a solution we can expect. First, the effect of shutter shock depends on something that for the most part goes unnoticed: the lens resolution.

I know some technically-interested photographers, among them Huntington Witherill and Mike Collette. Both have made guest posts – here’s Mike’s – in my blog about the a7R shutter shock. I’ve also been corresponding with other people about the problem. Recently, someone announced that, using the Witherill lens mounting method, that he had completely tamed the a7R shutter shock for a Canon zoom for all shutter speeds and all focal lengths out to 200mm. Well, I was amazed. Being from Missouri, I asked to see files from shots of ISO 12233 targets. When I looked at them, I saw that the lens was not resolving detail to the sensor’s pitch, or anywhere near it. Thus, the shutter shock motion was buried in the lens fuzziness. The photographer who claimed to have solved the shutter shock problem was completely right, for that lens. I’m pretty sure he would have had the problem with an optic of greater resolving power. I have been using some pretty special fixed-focal-length lenses for my testing. For example, in the last two tests, I’ve used the Leica 135mm f/3.4 APO Telyt on the a7R and the Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar ZF.2 on the D800E.

The second difference is the target. I’m using the ISO 12233 chart at 600 to 900 pixels vertical extent, which is an extremely demanding test. I can see effects with that target that would probably never be noticed in ordinary photography.

For those two reasons, my results are very conservative — they portray the a7R’s shutter in the most glaring, hard-edged light and make its flaws stand out. You may wish to derate some of my conclusions to make them more applicable to your lenses, subject matter, and output resolution.

There are other possible contributing differences. In the latest iteration of my testing, I’m checking my highest shutter speed results against trailing-curtain triggered 1/13000 second electronic flash. I’m also using 5500K illumination for the continuously-lit images, which minimizes the effect of diffraction compared to tungsten lighting (I still have to quantify this — it may not be significant.)

[Edit 5/3/2014: Since I originally posted this, in addition to the methods described above, I have been employing slanted edge MTF testing to get information of shutter shock. Here’s a link to a representative set of curves for the a7 and a7R,]

The Last Word

← More testing of the Sony a7R with the ISO 12233 target Testing the Zony 55 with the ISO 12233 target →

Trackbacks

  1. An Imatest is worth 1000 pictures. | sonyvnikon says:
    February 25, 2015 at 12:51 pm

    […] http://blog.kasson.com/?p=4713 […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on A Modest Proposal
  • Brandon on A Modest Proposal
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Christer Almqvist on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Paul R on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • JimK on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Jack Hogan on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Jack Hogan on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.