• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / The intellectual underpinnings of MTF analysis for handheld images, part 2

The intellectual underpinnings of MTF analysis for handheld images, part 2

March 12, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Actually, this post applies to MTF analysis in general, whether the camera is on a tripod or not.

In the previous post, I said:

to get the system’s modulation transfer function (MTF), we perform a Fourier transform on the system’s impulse response, or point-spread function (PSF), and throw away the imaginary part.

What do we give up by ignoring the imaginary, or phase, part of the Fourier transform of the PSF? Plenty. Without the phase part, we don’t have enough information to get back to the PSF. In fact, without the phase part, there are an infinite number of PSF’s that could have any given MTF.

Let me give you a concrete, one-dimensional example. I wrote this little Matlab script to compute the first five terms of the Fourier series for a square wave:

squarewave through 9 code

When you run the code, this is what you get:

squarewave through 9

 

Note the cute little Gibb’s Ears of overshoot and pre-shoot. They go away as the number of terms approaches infinity.

Now, let’s make one teensy three-letter change to the code, so that the fundamental frequency is 90 degrees out of phase with all the others:

squarewave through 9 cos code

When we run this code, here’s what we get:

squarewave through 9 cos

 

Oops, it doesn’t look anything like a square wave, does it?

The difference is even more striking if we use the first 1000 terms.

The code:

squarewave through 1999 code

The result:

squarewave through 1999

Changing the phase of the first term by 90 degrees:

squarewave through 1999 cos code

The result:

squarewave through 1999 cos

Throwing away the phase part is a common thing for engineers to do. It makes the data a lot more tractable, the graphs easier to read, and, in general, makes life more pleasant. However, it can lead to big mistakes. When the Compact Disc first came out, there was something wrong with the way the high frequencies sounded. The engineers had designed the anti-aliasing filters by looking at just the amplitude part of the filter transfer function, and the phase part had wild variations. The engineers argued that people couldn’t hear phase. They were wrong, as anyone with three function generators, a summing amp, and a pair of headphones can demonstrate to themselves. Modern CD players and recorders use oversampling and AA filters that consider phase.

So as we blithely sling around those MTF curves, we should remember that something is missing.

The Last Word

← The intellectual underpinnings of MTF analysis of handheld images Comparing sharpness in cameras with different-sized sensors →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.