• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Who are the rock-star sensor designers?

Who are the rock-star sensor designers?

February 12, 2015 JimK 3 Comments

Digital image sensors are for the most part analog integrated circuits. Traditionally, analog ICs, and analog circuits in general, have been an area where a few highly-talented engineers made the breakthroughs and basked in the acclaim from their fellow engineers, if not necessarily becoming rich in the process.

Everybody who knows a lot about hi-fi knows who John Curl and Nelson Pass are and probably David Hafler, Bob Carver, Bill Johnson, Dan D’Agostino, Julius Futterman, and Jim Bongiorno. Full disclosure: I’ve been a big fan of Nelson Pass for decades, and still have a Threshold SL-10 preamp that’s been internally modified by Threshold to the FET-One circuit configuration. I also own a First Watt Aleph 1 class A power amp.

In the early days of analog ICs Bob Widlar dominated the scene, designing the fast-but-hard-to-us uA702 and the breakthrough  uA709 when he was at Fairchild, decamping for National, where he designed the LM101/301 that was the design benchmark for years, and the inspiration for David Fullagar’s uA741 that’s probably the top selling op amp of all time. Bob was a larger-than-life character, and his antics on and off the job were the stuff of Silicon Valley legend. Two more Bobs, Bob Pease and Bob Dobkin, followed in his footsteps, and every circuit designer in the world knew their names.

If you asked me for a list of sensor designers, I could only come up with one name: Eric Fossum, the father of the CMOS sensor. Why is that? Are sensors so complicated that they are now designed by teams of faceless engineers? Do today’s companies grab the credit for technical breakthroughs to their corporate selves, keeping the public from knowing the engineers who made the creative leaps? Or am I just not paying attention?

 

The Last Word

← Not too much celebrating Turning around →

Comments

  1. n/a says

    February 12, 2015 at 1:59 pm

    first of all there relevant patents – patents have names, some names you see often, some very often

    then this thread 🙂 = http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/36416103

    so -> Gennadiy Agranov, Fossum’s one time co-worker

    Reply
  2. Eric says

    February 13, 2015 at 1:35 pm

    Even an outstanding design needs good fabrication process to show its superiority. Most of development in image sensors is now happening in companies like Sony and Samsung, both have fabs of their own, and those fabs are bests of the world, after Intel. It tells something I think

    Reply
  3. AS says

    February 17, 2015 at 12:41 am

    If you follow the stream of patents posted on Image Sensors World, you will see the names of designers. Some reflect team efforts, while others are breakthroughs by a lone individual.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.