• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Yesterday’s oak tree images

Yesterday’s oak tree images

March 16, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Here are a few images from yesterday.

[Group 6]-_DSC0461 (2)__DSC0494 (2)-34 images_0001-Edit

[Group 9]-_DSC0846 (2)__DSC0959 (2)-114 images_0000-Edit

[Group 5]-_DSC0353 (2)__DSC0457 (2)-105 images_0001-Edit

The top one is my favorite. I like the rectilinear mapping. It’s not often I can use it because my usual total stitched image field is too wide. Maybe I’ll experiment with a longer lens — these were all with a 60 — to narrow the field of view.

In the bottom two I struggled with the same mergers that I dealt with in one of the images that I posted yesterday. I’ll do some more experimentation with the channel mixer. I could also try some filtration over the lens, but I’ve experienced flare problems with filters when shooting into the sun.

I have a a7II at LivePixel being converted to use the standard IR filter. That might be the best way to go deeper without using a filter in front of the lens. The standard IR filter will let less light through than the Super Color filter I’m using now, but the IBIS on the a7II might compensate for that.

[Later] OK, I figured out what to do with the merger on the big oak against the dawn. I’d been trying to get the foliage lighter than the sky and it just wasn’t working. I added three channel mixer layers, each one omitting one color channel and played with the possibilities. Here’s the stack I ended up with in Ps:

oak tree curves

You can see that leaving out the blue channel works the best.

Here’s the result:

[Group 9]-_DSC0846 (2)__DSC0959 (2)-114 images_0000-Edit-2

Much better, as far as I’m concerned. What do you think?

I don’t think I can save the other one. I worked and worked on it. I worked so hard I saw this:

Ps stopped working

Maybe that’s a sign.

The Last Word

← Wednesday’s oak trees A bunch of nearly normal lenses →

Comments

  1. Eric Hanson says

    March 17, 2015 at 1:59 am

    I really like the second one. I may like it better than the new version of it.

    I had picked the second one as my favorite as I like the composition.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      March 17, 2015 at 6:49 am

      Eric,

      Thanks for your comment. I haven’t printed any of these yet. I have an informal showing on Friday, and now I think I’l print them both for that.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.