• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad X2D exposure strategy, M and A modes

Hasselblad X2D exposure strategy, M and A modes

October 12, 2022 JimK 3 Comments

This is the 23rd in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

In this post, I looked at the X2D deep shadow noise versus ISO.

Some conclusions:

  • The camera is ISOless from 200 up.
  • There is an improvement in input-referred read noise when you go from ISO 100 to ISO 200, but that improvement is material only in the deepest shadows.

So, assuming that you are setting your f-stops, shutter speeds, and ISO settings manually, what is the best strategy?

If you can, expose to the right (ETTR) at base ISO. This is a no-brainer and is true for just about any digital camera. What keeps it from working all the time?

  • There is no live histogram on the X2D so you can’t tell whether the raw file is saturating or not without making an exposure and champing. Even then, you’re not looking at a raw histogram. UniWB helps, but most people don’t want to go to all that trouble and look at green preview images, and even UniWB is not a panacea.
  • You may need more light on the sensor. Depth of field (DOF) requirements and dealing with camera motion and subject motion often conspire to make the ideal exposure impractical.

So now what, assuming that you’re shooting RAW?

  1. Decide on the f-stop you need based on DOF, not the light.
  2. Decide on the shutter speed you need based on motion blur, not the light.
  3. Then set the ISO; deciding that gets a bit more complicated.

The first thing to do is figure out the ISO that would place the significant highlights on the right side of the histogram; let’s call that the metered ISO.  I want to reserve ETTR for base ISO exposures, and we’ve already decided that this scene won’t let us do ETTR at base ISO.

  1. If that ISO is 64 or 100, ISO to 64 or 100 and make the exposure. If that ISO is 200 or as much as three stops over, set the ISO to 200 and make the exposure. You’ll get more highlight protection, and it won’t cost you anything significant in shadow noise.
  2. If that ISO is over 3200, set the ISO setting to three stops under the metered ISO. Three stops of extra highlight protection should be enough for almost any scene, and pushing too much in postproduction can cause some color shifts.

That sounds complicated, but once you’ve gone through the steps a few times, you can figure out the camera settings you need instantly.

Let’s work through a few examples.

From the sample histogram, you decide that that sunset-with-foreground you’re shooting needs f/11, and the wind means you need 1/250. But the histogram tells you that, in order to get a right-populated histogram you need ISO 100. The picture is all about the highlights. Shoot with the ISO dial set to 64, so you’ll get some protection.

You’re shooting the Milky Way, and with the lens set wide open at f/2.8 and a 15-second exposure, which is all you can manage before the stars start to blur, the ISO setting for a right-loaded histogram would be 3200. But the stars are tiny, and the histogram might not be finding the brightest ones, or they might not make a big enough bump to see. Set the ISO to 400.

Now let’s move on to a slightly different situation, one in which you are not trying to get the settings for a single exposure or a set of exposures of the same subject in the same light, but a situation in which you want camera settings that will work over a modest range of lighting and camera angle changes. This is a situation in which your first instinct might be to use one of the X2D automatic exposure modes. However, you will see that there can be advantages to setting the camera’s exposure manually.

For your anticipated typical shot, use the techniques above to decide your settings. Then decide how much the scene and lighting is likely to change, and in what direction. If you think it will get brighter, bias the settings you came up with for highlight protection. If darker conditions are more likely, make the bias in favor of shadow SNR. The advantages of this approach over A, S, or P modes are:

  1. You get the shutter speed you need to deal with the motion, and no faster.
  2. You get the aperture you need to deal with DOF, and no narrower.
  3. You don’t have to try to figure out what the heck the metering system is doing to your exposures.
  4. You’ve got an ISO setting that does what you want it to do, even as conditions change.

This way of exposing is quite different than the way that most folks use, and is fluid and freeing in practice, removing worries about exposure and producing optimal files.

This is what I do most of the time. But you can use A or S mode if you prefer.

What if you’re in a fluid situation and  want to use aperture priority exposure mode?

The cardinal rule remains the same: If you can, expose to the right (ETTR) at base ISO. With the X2D you can take a shot and look at the histogram as you review the capture. Set your exposure compensation (EC) so that your meter will give you that exposure. You might want to bias the exposure slightly towards underexposure if the light is changing since it’s easier to deal with a bit more noise in the shadows than blown highlights.

But let’s ask what you should do if the ETTR exposure is too long for you or requires a wider lens opening than you want to use. If the lens opening is the most important thing to you:

  • Set the ISO to base ISO
  • Set the camera to aperture-priority exposure mode
  • Set the aperture to whatever you wish
  • Take a picture and chimp; ff the ETTR exposure is acceptable, you’re done; take the shot
  • If the shutter speed is too long, and you want some extra highlight protection, crank the EC down (make the numbers more negative) until you get an acceptable shutter speed.
  • If that gets you an acceptable shutter speed, you’re done; take the shot.
  • If not, set the ISO to 200
  • If the exposure is acceptable, you’re done; take the shot.
  • If the shutter speed is too long, and you want some extra highlight protection, crank the EC down (make the numbers more negative) until you get an acceptable shutter speed.
  • Stop when you get to three stops underexposed.
  • If that’s still too long an exposure, increase ISO until you get a shutter speed you can live with, keeping the EC three stops underexposed.

Sounds like a lot of fiddling, but after you’ve painstakingly followed the steps above a few times, you’ll get a feel for it and will be able to take many shortcuts. The idea is to make use of the highlight protection that comes with what would generally be called underexposure, and boost the gain in postproduction, which, thanks to the nature of the GFX 100S sensor, has practically no noise penalty.

If the shutter speed is what’s key for you, use the above procedure, but set the camera to S mode and swap aperture and shutter speed in the protocol.

If the scene has low contrast, this is unnecessary, but it won’t do any harm.

 

 

X2D

← Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 lens cap Bill Claff’s PDR ratings for the X2D and GFX 100S →

Comments

  1. Christer Almqvist says

    October 13, 2022 at 7:32 am

    I do it a bit like you. But perhaps for another reason. For me A is the most important variable, followed by S to make sure blur is minimized. I used to use the camera’s minimum shutter speed option to reduce blur, but I found it to be too inflexible; it did not take into account the camera stability situation (like hand held vs placed on a table). And it was to cumbersome to change.

    The only disadvantage of adjusting EC is that the display gets rather dark. Picture quality is the same due to iso invariance except that the shorter shutter speed may make a lot of difference.

    Most of my lenses have an aperture ring which is very convenient when shooting like I do. My camera is a Sony A7R3.

    Here is how i do it:

    1. set iso to 640 (dynamic range like 250 but perhaps more noise)

    2. use A priority

    3. set A to suit subject (dof)

    4. check if resulting S will prevent blur

    5. if not, adjust EC (back-adjust in PP)

    6. if 5 is not sufficient, adjust iso and/or A

    Reply
  2. barry says

    October 14, 2022 at 10:43 am

    using a Sony A1 ISO640 is the worst noise I have seen in files ISO500 is dead clean

    Reply
  3. Dominique says

    February 2, 2025 at 5:22 am

    Now that the X2D has a histogram how would you use it?
    I’m curious about this iso invariability, something I never heard of…
    Because I’ve a job to do where 3D sculpture are to shown in a very dark environment, I was looking how to best capture this (lots od different gray values that are important) that I came to this article. I must admit I don’t fully understand what is explained here (it’s not my mother language), and some 10-year old explaining would be better for me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.