• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad X2D FWC, RN, and PTC’s

Hasselblad X2D FWC, RN, and PTC’s

October 10, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the 20th in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”. It’s also about the GFX 100S, so I’ve tagged it for that camera, as well.

Alphabet soup in that post title, huh? I’ll break it down for you.

  • FWC is full well capacity, a measure of the number of electrons the sensor can store on each pixel. Higher means a higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) for shots that are exposed to the right.
  • RN is read noise. That’s the noise you see on the sensor when there is no light applied. In this most, I’m measuring it in terms of the the charge on the photodiodes on the sensor, and it is also measured in electrons.
  • PTC’s are photon transfer curves. They plot the SNR on the vertical axis versus the mean raw values on the horizontal axis.

Here’s the PTC for the X2D with 14-bit precision from the sensor:

The crosses are the measured values. The lines are the values that result when the measured values are fitted to a standard sensor model. There is a good match between the measured and modeled values, indication that Hasselblad isn’t playing nonlinear or spatial computational games with the raw files.  The curves are, on the right from top to bottom, for ISO 64, 100,200, 400, 800, 1600, and 3200. Except for that little droop in the ISO 64 curve 12 stops down from full scale, they are exactly what you’d expect from a dual conversion gain camera that changes from low conversion gain to high conversion gain at ISO 200.

Here is the modeled read noise versus ISO setting for the four raw channels:

The is very respectable. The camera is essentially ISO-less above ISO 200.

Here is the modeled FWC versus ISO setting for the four raw channels.

In a perfect world, these would all be the same. They are close to that. The FWC appears to be about 45,000 electrons.

No surprises here. This is the same sensor that we’ve known and loved in the GFX 100 and GFX 100S. It’s just programmed differently in the X2D.

X2D

← GFX 100S, X2D 30-second-exposure self heating Hasselblad X2D ISOlessness, visuals →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

December 2025
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Nov    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Family photography with the X2D/XCD90V and the GFX 100 II/GF110
  • Jonathan on Family photography with the X2D/XCD90V and the GFX 100 II/GF110
  • Thomas on GFX 100 II pixel shift
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Pieter Kers on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Stefan Feaux de Lacroix on Fujifilm GFX 100RF inclusive review
  • Lou Jost on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Craig Stocks on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.