• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 on X2D 100C, Siemens star

Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 on X2D 100C, Siemens star

September 26, 2022 JimK 2 Comments

This is the fifth in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

In the last post, I presented slanted edge MTF50 results for the Hasselblad 38 mm f/2.5 XCD lens on the X2D 100C camera. Please see that post for setup and test conditions.

In this post, I’ll show you images of the Siemens star on axis and at the right edge. All these images are tight crops that are magnified to about 170%. All were developed in Lightroom with sharpening amount set to 20 and otherwise at default. The images were white balanced to the gray star surround.

In the center:

Center f/2.5

 

Center f/2.8

 

Center f/4

 

Center, f/5.6

 

Center f/8

 

Center, f/11

All but the f/11 image are pretty darned sharp. In the f/11 image, the diffusion blur is sufficient to avoid visible aliasing. That is also true of GF lenses on the GFX 100x.

With the target on the right side, for the image with the highest MTF50 for tangential (horizontal) edges, and a half-stop Exposure boost in Lr to approximately compensate for lens falloff at f/2.5.

Edge, sharpest tangential, f/2.5

 

Edge, sharpest tangential, f/2.8

 

Edge, sharpest tangential, f/4

 

Edge, sharpest tangential, f/5.6

 

Edge, sharpest tangential, f/8

 

Edge, sharpest tangential, f/11

None of these are blow-your-mind sharp. Given the price of this lens, I’m a little disappointed.

X2D

← Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 on X2D 100C MTF50 Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 on X2D 100C, LaCA →

Comments

  1. Erik says

    October 28, 2022 at 12:41 am

    How much does adding a shutter to every lens add to the price?

    All the center shots look great to me. From what I can tell, the edge shots all have lost contrast in comparison, and start to show some CA. I’m assuming the exposure variation between edge shots has to do with the need to compensate for light fall-off.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 28, 2022 at 9:09 am

      How much does adding a shutter to every lens add to the price?

      Hard to say. Since the volume ins low, it probably adds a few hundred dollars to the cost of goods sold.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.