• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad X2D ISOlessness, visuals

Hasselblad X2D ISOlessness, visuals

October 11, 2022 JimK 6 Comments

This is the 21st in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

In the previous post, I determined that the H2D is ISOless above ISO 200. Today I’m going to give a visual demonstration of that. The subject is my bookcase, which has a long history of volunteering for the task whenever I do this kinds of test.

The setup:

  • X2D with XCD 38 attached.
  • RRS legs
  • Arca Swiss head
  • 2-second self timer
  • Manual focus, using focus by wire and the focus indicator
  • f/5.6
  • Base image, ISO 200 at 2.5 seconds, which is ETTR
  • Five images also at ISO 200, but with less exposure in one-stop steps, so that the final image is -5 EV from ETTR.
  • Five images with ISO increasing and exposure decreasing in one-stop steps.
  • Developed in the current version of Lightroom CC
  • Default settings except for the following
  • White balanced to the second from left gray square on the Macbeth chart for the ISO 200 image.
  • Applied that white balance to al the other images
  • Sharpening set to zero
  • Noise reduction set to zero
  • Each underexposed shot of the ISO 200 series pushed with Lr’s Exposure control by the amount of underexposure.

A few sample images:

ISO 200 ETTR

 

ISO 200, -5 EV

 

ISO 6400

 

Some 1:1 crops:

ISO 200 ETTR

 

ISO 200, -1EV

 

ISO 400

 

ISO 200, -2 EV

 

ISO 800

 

ISO 200, -3 EV

 

ISO 1600

 

ISO 200, -4 EV

 

ISO 3200

 

ISO 200, -5 EV

 

ISO 6400

How about color shifts?

ISO 200 ETTR

 

ISO 200, -1EV

 

ISO 400

 

ISO 200, -2 EV

 

ISO 800

 

ISO 200, -3 EV

 

ISO 1600

 

ISO 200, -4 EV

 

ISO 3200

 

ISO 200, -5 EV

 

ISO 6400

 

When I’ve done this with some other cameras, I see significant white balance errors on the hard-pushed shots. That’s not happening here.

 

X2D

← Hasselblad X2D FWC, RN, and PTC’s Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 lens cap →

Comments

  1. Michele Barana says

    October 11, 2022 at 3:49 pm

    Hi Jim,

    Is it behaving like the gfx50s where above iso 1600 the data written in the raw file was the same as iso 1600 and then Fuji relied on digital gain in the raw processor?

    Thanks for your work,

    Michele

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 11, 2022 at 3:56 pm

      No, it’s applying analog gain up through ISO 12800.

      Reply
  2. John says

    October 12, 2022 at 9:39 am

    How does this compare to the GFX 100s?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 12, 2022 at 1:06 pm

      The GFX 100S switches to high conversion gain later, and thus starts its ISOless behavior later. Otherwise, the cameras are similar in their shadow response.

      Reply
  3. Hector Leon says

    December 16, 2023 at 5:08 pm

    Hello Jim,

    Would you have a diagram illustrating the relation between (Shadow) Noise vs ISO that we can combine with your diagram about EDR vs ISO to try to find a good ISO that reduces noise but maximizes EDR (for Astrphotography)? It seems that number is ISO 200.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 16, 2023 at 5:34 pm

      https://blog.kasson.com/x2d/hasselblad-x2d-fwc-rn-and-ptcs/

      See the first set of curves.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.