• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z9 / How fast is the Z9 shutter?

How fast is the Z9 shutter?

January 27, 2022 JimK 18 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z9. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z9”.

To measure how fast focal plane shutters are, I use a setup like this:

 

What do we have here?

  • Z9 on camera stand via a C1 cube
  • ISO 2000
  • Z9 set to 1/2000 second exposure
  • CV 125/2.5 on Z9
  • Lens set to f/2.5
  • Analog oscilloscope, sweep speed 0.5 milliseconds per division
  • Function generator set to produce a 10 KHz triangle wave

Here’s the picture the camera took:

The bright green traces are the ones to look at.  The dimmer green traces are due to phosphor persistence in the scope. The width of the green band is about one division. One division is 500 microseconds. 1/2000 second is 500 microseconds. Earlier time is on the left, and later time is on the right. So the shutter exposes the sensor from the top of the image to the bottom. That’s the same as saying the shutter exposes the sensor from the bottom of the sensor to the top. That is the way that Sony MILCs have done things, but is the opposite of the traditional Nikon shutter direction.

It takes 7.4 divisions for the start — and the end — of the exposure to travel from the top of the image to the bottom. That means it takes 3.7 milliseconds for that to happen. 3.7 milliseconds is 1/270 second.

Pretty fast for a FF electronic shutter.

 

Z9

← High-ISO Z9 shadow noise — visuals Nikon Z9 RN, FWC, PDR →

Comments

  1. John says

    January 28, 2022 at 2:14 pm

    Is the Z9 a good landscape camera or is the D850 better

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 28, 2022 at 2:18 pm

      If you are strictly concerned with dynamic range at base ISO, the D850 is your camera. However, the Z9 is much easier to focus manually. I’d take the Z9.

      Reply
  2. Andreas says

    January 29, 2022 at 1:00 pm

    So with this kind of sensor readout speed, can we assume Z9 is able to take 8k video at 120 fps?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 29, 2022 at 1:09 pm

      It cannot do that.

      Reply
    • Lucas says

      February 6, 2022 at 9:56 am

      The blazing fast readout speed of 3.7ms in stills mode is achieved by utilising DRAM, which does not function in video mode. The ADC has to continuously operate and output data in video mode and it’s limited by thermal and power constraint.

      Reply
  3. Dibyendu Majumdar says

    February 5, 2022 at 3:21 pm

    Hi Jim

    Based on your tests, do you think the Z9 sensor is based on Sony A1 or it is different in some fundamental ways that would indicate it is not a Sony sensor.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 5, 2022 at 6:19 pm

      I don’t know. It has a lot in common with recent Sony sensors.

      Reply
  4. Andy Miller says

    July 10, 2022 at 12:57 pm

    Out of interest if you rant this test at the fastest shutter speed of 1/32000th second what would it show?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 10, 2022 at 1:12 pm

      Same transit time. Thinner band. Dimmer image.

      Reply
      • Andy Miller says

        July 11, 2022 at 1:29 am

        hi – thanks for the response, but it simply does not sound right. How can the whole sensor be scanned in 1/32,000 second – so 0.03125 milli seconds and yet the transit time sty at 1/250 — surely the transit time must vary to reflect the shutter speed. What about if you ran your test at 1/50, 1/500, and 1/5000 second – I would expect the slope shown on your chart to be much flatter, flatter and much steeper than your example.
        Or maybe I simply do not understand your chart -I had assume your chart shows readings the whole of the sensor or a vertical slice.

        Reply
        • JimK says

          July 11, 2022 at 7:50 am

          The image posted is a photograph of a time-varying subject. It does include the whole of the sensor, but reflects what the camera is recording at various times, starting on the left side of the image, and getting later on the right.

          I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how a focal place shutter — electronic or mechanical — works. It doesn’t expose the whole sensor at exactly the same time. There are two — electronic or mechanical — curtains. They both travel in the same direction, usually from top to bottom or bottom to top of the image when the camera is in landscape orientation. The first one proceeds across the sensor at some more-or-less constant rate. The time it takes to get to the other side is called the transit time — it’s the time the shutter takes to traverse the sensor. The second curtain starts after the first one, delayed by the amount of time determined by the shutter speed. If the shutter speed is set to 1 second, the second curtain starts 1 second later. If the time is set to 1/1000 second, the second curtain starts 1 millisecond later. If the shutter speed is long, then there are times when the whole sensor is exposed to light. If the shutter speeds are shorter than the transit time, a slit passes over the shutter. At 1/32000 second, it’s a very narrow slit.

          I once had a camera, a 4×5 Speed Graphic, which allowed the user to vary the transit time of the shutter. I’ve never seen a 35 mm or medium format camera that allowed that, except by changing shutter modes. The Z9 has no mechanical shutter, and thus doesn’t allow the user to change the transit time.

          Reply
  5. DennisM says

    December 20, 2022 at 3:55 pm

    Hi
    do you know what the Shutter lag is for the Z9. The D850 was about 57ms, is the Z9 faster?
    I think I read that once the first image is taken the shutter lag is about 7ms?
    great post

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 20, 2022 at 5:00 pm

      The Z9 should have less shutter latency than the D850, but I haven’t measured it.

      Reply
  6. Kid Dev says

    August 19, 2023 at 10:09 pm

    Hi Jim, was this 14 bit or 12 bit readout speed?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 20, 2023 at 8:55 am

      I’m sorry I didn’t note that. 14 bit precision.

      Reply
  7. Christian says

    August 20, 2023 at 2:28 am

    Hello Mr. Kasson,

    you did some impressive mesurements. Today i did some first test: Some lightbarrier should trigger the flash and the Z9 independently. Z9 is setup manually, no AF, standby time is increased, Series or Single mode , exposure time about 1/10 in M mode, Silent mode and so on to be as fast as possible. I added some delay in the flash trigger path beware of the shutter lag. To my surprise the flash is only partial visible on the picture after about 40ms and reliable after 50ms. So my question, did you make the same experience? Can the shutter lag be reduced by another setting?

    Thank you in advance

    Christian

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 20, 2023 at 8:57 am

      That seems a little long to me, although I didn’t test shutter latency on the camera. What’s the flash delay?

      Reply
  8. Christian says

    August 29, 2023 at 2:55 am

    I just did some measurements from camera input trigger to Flash X-Sync Pin (need some high value pullup resistor to camera 5V Pin nearby), Shutter delay is really in the range from 48-57ms with FTZ adaptor + 105mm Nikon Micro VR G mount (quite slow, i am dissapointed). It can not be reduced by any other camera setting. About 10ms can be saved by using some old lenses with preadjusted manual aperture rings, but some extra Z Mount adaptor is needed for this. The FTZ adaptor does not seem to support this mode (FEE error). Flash delay is in the range of about 120us for Yongnuo 685. So the Z9 is the limiting factor.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.