• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z9 / Nikon Z9 PRNU spectra

Nikon Z9 PRNU spectra

February 5, 2022 JimK 2 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z9. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z9”.

What’s PRNU? It’s pixel response nonlinearity. That’s the difference in the way that pixels in the sensor respond to the same amount of light. It’s often so low that it’s covered up by photon noise, and that’s a good thing. But there were some periodic patterns in the Sony a9, which used a 12-row block readout like the Z9, so I wanted to take a look.

I made 168 photographs of a white card at 1/6 second shutter speed and ISO 64, using the Nikon 105/2.8 F-mount macro lens. I averaged them all, and looked at the spectra of the result.

 

The above is for the red raw channel. The low-frequency energy is mostly due to uneven illumination. In the horizontal directions, there are few significant periodic components (which cause spikes). There are six in the vertical direction. The spikes are lower in amplitude and more concentrated in frequency than the a9 spikes.

First green raw channel

 

Second green raw channel

 

Blue raw channel

Because the effects are seen in all four raw channels, this doesn’t look like it’s caused by PDAF. The blue channel is slightly more affected, which does probably relate to PDAF.

Here’s what a tight crop of the averaged image looks like with a hefty contrast boost:

You can see horizontally oriented patterns.

My tentative conclusion is that I don’t think this is anything to worry about. The a9 had worse horizontal patterning, and there were few complaints (those centered about darkish blue skies).

Z9

← Nikon Z9 and ISOlessness Nikon Z7 shutter transit times →

Comments

  1. Bill Claff says

    February 5, 2022 at 1:19 pm

    I would call this Fixed Pattern Noise (PFN) as opposed to Phot-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU)
    PRNU is generally measured in percent for the full frame.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 5, 2022 at 1:39 pm

      Well, it’s quite a bit different from the zero signal FPN. It appears to relate to small gain differences in the 12 ADCs per column.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.