• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 65/2 Apo-Lanthar 1:2 corner sharpness

65/2 Apo-Lanthar 1:2 corner sharpness

October 10, 2017 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the eighth in a series of posts about the Voigtlander 65 mm f/2 Apo-Lanthar macro lens. The series starts here. 

In this post, I showed 65 mm f/2 Apo-Lanthar center and corner performance at f/2 and at a 1:2 reproduction ratio. Unsurprisingly, the corners were slightly softer than the center. I have improved my lighting and alignment procedures, and am ready to show you a similar test at narrower apertures. Lighting is with two Godox AD-200’s using the LED heads at maximum power. Images developed in Lightroom at default settings except that white balance is set to Flash and exposure for all was tweaked identically. I did not correct for corner light falloff; what you see is what you get. Focusing was performed at f/2.8 in the center. So this is also a field flatness test. From the f/2 similar test, we know the field is pretty darn flat. From the focus shift test I did at 1:2 earlier, focusing at f/2.8 is a good choice with this lens at this distance for shots using that aperture, f/4, and f/5.6.

From this test, we know that f/2.8 is the sharpest aperture at 1:2 on-axis. So I’ll start at f/2.8, with tight crops that are shown here at about 200%.

 

f/2.8 Center

 

f/2.8 LR

The corner is not quite as sharp as the center, but it’s pretty close. This isn’t the best target in the world for this test; I’lll be looking for a better one. 

f/4 Center

 

f/4 LR

The corner is sharper than at f/2.8. If the focus is nailed, I know the center is less sharp from the razor blade test, but I can’t see it here.

f/5.6 Center

 

f/5.6 LR

I don’t see a lot of difference here. 

This is quite a lens.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a9 LCD lag My photography in a nutshell →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.