• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji GFX-50S questions

Fuji GFX-50S questions

March 25, 2017 JimK 2 Comments

This is the sixth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

From the mailbag:

I am so pleased that you are testing the Fuji. [Embarrassingly generous compliment removed]

I am considering getting the camera, in part to use for my f-mount Otus 55mm and 135mm APO, in part as a relatively inexpensive back for a tech cam set up. I have some questions.

1) How does the Otus 55mm perform?

2) How does the sensor cover glass on the Fuji affect performance of those lenses, in comparison with the Nikon D800, say, for which the lenses were designed? (You showed that the 55mm does less well on the A7rii than the Nikon. Does the Fuji do less well too?)

3) What is the adapter like? How are you tripod-mounting the set-up?

4) Is there any any indication that there would be corner smearing with wider tech cam lenses?

Answers:

  1. Very well. See the previous post. The corners in a 4:3 crop might be a bit problematical.
  2. WRT the D810, that’s a really hard thing to get at, since the camera pitches are different. The Nikon D810 pitch is 4.87 um, and the Fuji GFX pitch is 5.31 um. I might look at it if I can figure out a good way to make the measurements and level the playing field. Concerning the Fuji, that’s hard so say since I can’t use a Fuji lens on a D810. With the right adapter, I might be able to use one on an a7RII, but it would have to be smart to allow focusing the lens. 
  3.  I’m using the Fotodiox adapter for Nikon F lenses. My favorite adapter supplier, Kipon, has announced a broad line of adapters, but I don’t think they are shipping yet. I actually got the Fotodiox adapter a month before I got the camera. I’m just mounting the camera to the tripod head with a RRS generic plate. The Fuji H-mount adapter is very well executed, and works flawlessly, at lease so far. It comes with a rotating collar-style tripod mount. 
  4. I’m guessing that there could be corner smearing with non-retrofocal short lenses. I don’t have any such lenses to try so far. I’m thinking that the smaller microlenses that Fuji is using might help with corner color casting with such lenses, but I don’t know yet.

Keep those questions coming, folks.

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Hassselblad 150/3.2 on Fujiflim GFX-50S Zony 55 on a7RII & Fuji 63 on GFX-50S →

Comments

  1. Caspar says

    March 25, 2017 at 7:29 pm

    Thanks so much Jim! Very helpful indeed. Nice to see that both the APO 135 and Otus 55 work well.

    If you do figure out a way to compare the lenses on the Fuji and Nikon, I will be very interested. It had always slightly bugged me that, on the a7rii, I was not getting full performance out of them.

    But you have done a tremendous amount already!

    Best,
    Caspar

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX50S Shipments Are Arriving, Aurora Borealis, More Adapter Glass, and Reviews | Fuji Addict says:
    March 26, 2017 at 9:28 am

    […] Glass and Reviews The Last Word – […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.