• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Archives for 2015

Archives for 2015

MTF testing of 70-200mm lenses

October 11, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Imatest, the company who makes the software that I use to measure the modulation transfer function (MTF) of camera/lens combinations, expects you to fill the frame with one of their test charts, carefully align the camera so that the lens axis in perpendicular to the chart plane (or, equivalently, so the chart and sensor planes… [Read More]

The Last Word

Sony 70-200/4 on an a7RII, Nikon 70-20/2.8 on a D810

October 10, 2015 JimK 5 Comments

Last week, I posted some images that compared the performance of the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 GII ED to the Sony 70-200 f/4 G OSS FE when both were mounted to a Sony a7RII. Part of the controversy related to whether eyeballing images was a useful way to compare lenses when MTF curves were available. Well,… [Read More]

The Last Word

a7Rii, D810 flash synch revisited

October 6, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Yesterday, I made two posts aimed at discerning whether EFCS affected the maximum flash synch speed in the Sony a7RII and the Nikon D810. The answer was that EFCS made no difference, but there was an anomaly revealed in the testing: neither camera appeared to synch perfectly at its maximum specified synch speed. I figured… [Read More]

The Last Word

D810 EFCS and flash synch

October 5, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Earlier today, I posted the results of a test of the maximum synch speed of the Sony a7RII with both EFCS on and EFCS off. It appeared that the camera’s true synch speed was 1/200 second in both modes. That got me wondering. Would the D810, with a specified synch speed of 1/320 second, fare… [Read More]

The Last Word

Mixing and matching lenses and cameras

October 5, 2015 JimK 9 Comments

In response to yesterday’s Nikon/Sony 70-200 testing, a reader commented: Isn’t it established that Sony lenses are optimized for the Sony sensor and vice versa. (although more skewed against WA due to Sony’s sensor lenses and thickness. Putting the Nikon on the Sony is a little like putting P-Zero’s on a Prius. I don’t believe… [Read More]

The Last Word

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 65
  • Next Page »
May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.