• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R

Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R

December 19, 2013 JimK 1 Comment

I tested the Coastal Optical 60mm F/4 APO and the Leica 50mm f/1.4 Summilux APSH on the Sony a7R. These are both truly impressive lenses, and in the Leica barely edges out the Coastal Optical lens in the center. However, in the corners, the a7R smears the Summilux images, and it’s no contest.

The scene, with the 50mm lens:

L1004490

With the Coastal Optical lens, there is some falloff at f/4. A bit remains at f/5.6, and it’s gone after that. With the Summilux, the corners are darkened at f/4, and it happens so suddenly it looks more like interaction of the lens with the sensor than just plain falloff. The corners look about the same in density from f/5.6  through f/11.

1:1 crops of the center, starting with the Coastal Optical at f/4:

60 a7r f4 ctr

We pick up a little sharpness at f/5.6 but it’s hard to see because the light changed between exposures:

60 a7r f56 ctr

f/8 is slightly sharper yet:

60 a7r f8 ctr

And f/11 is more like f/5.6:

60 a7r f11 ctr

With the Summilux, the f/4 image starts out a bit sharper than the Coastal Optical lens at the same aperture, but it’s hard to sort that out because of the different focal lengths:

50 a7r f4 ctr

At f/5.6 there’s not much improvement over f/4, but the Leica still marginally bests the American lens:

50 a7r f56 ctr

There’s not much change at f/8, and now the Coastal Optical lens is neck and neck with the Leica:

50 a7r f8 ctr

Things get fuzzier at f/11, and now the Coastal Optical lens is doing better than the German glass:

50 a7r f11 ctr

As I said at the outset, these are both great performers in the center of the sensor.

Here’s a link to a Photoshop stack with all the images.

Coming up – the side of the image.

The Last Word

← An irreproducible result Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R — right side →

Trackbacks

  1. Coastal 60/4 UV-VIS-IR on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    April 22, 2017 at 4:55 pm

    […] UR and UV wavelengths as well as visible ones. I’ve tested it several times (here, here, and here), and found that it is pretty sharp, but not astoundingly so. The 120/4 would walk all over it, and […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.