the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R — right side

Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R — right side

December 19, 2013 By JimK Leave a Comment

This continues an analysis of the Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 APO and the Leica 50mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH on the Sony a7R. In the previous post we looked at the center. Now we examine the right side.

Along the right side of the image, the Coastal Optical lens is a little low in contrast at f/4.

60 ar7 4 rt

It picks up a little of both at f/5.6:

60 ar7 56 rt

And there’s a big step up in quality at f/8:

60 ar7 8 rt

f/11 is just the tiniest bit better yet:

60 ar7 11 rt

With the Summilux at f/4, the image is distinctly soft, and there’s that smeary look that I’m getting all too familiar with as I review the a7R:

50 ar7 4 rt

Stopping down to f/5.6 brings some improvement, but not nearly enough to catch the Coastal Optical lens:

50 ar7 56 rt

At f/8, things are better, even adequate for most purposes, but the Coastal Optical lens is still excelling:

50 ar7 8 rt

At f/11, diffraction is cancelling most of the smearing improvement brought by stopping down from f/8, and the quality is at best the same as the Coastal Optical lens wide open:

50 ar7 11 rt

Here’s a link to a Photoshop stack with all the images.

The Summilux would probably be fine for portraits on the a7R, but it wouldn’t be my first – or second – choice for landscapes.

← Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R Controlling for shutter slap →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Anthony New on Camera resolution and 4K viewing — summary
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • JimK on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • JimK on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • CarVac on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • JimK on Detectability of visual signals below the noise
  • JimK on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • Bill Claff on Detectability of visual signals below the noise
  • Mike B on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • Robert Frangioso on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.