• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / a7RIII shadow noise — ISOs 640-10000

a7RIII shadow noise — ISOs 640-10000

July 25, 2018 JimK 2 Comments

This is one of a series of posts on the Sony a7RIII.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7RIII”.

Earlier today, I showed graphs relating the Sony a7RIII’s noise to the ISO setting in the camera. Earlier today, I posted visual takes on the noise differences from ISO 100 through 500. In the previous post, I did the same thing for ISO’s 640 through 5000. Now I’m going to add one more stop to the ISO range, making it from 640 to 10000.

I made a series of images of my standard subject for this test all with the same shutter speed, using an Otus 55/1.4 set to f/4, at ISOs 640 through 10000 in one stop increments. The exposure I chose was ETTR at ISO 10000, and thus quite a bit underexposed at ISO 640. I processed them all in Lightroom with default settings except for a custom white balance that assured that the WB wouldn’t change from image to image. Here are the full-frame images from the beginning and end of the series.

ISO 10000

 

ISO 640

Then I boosted Lightroom’s Exposure control by an amount that compensated for the underexposure. Since each click on the far right of the Exposure widget in the Library window is a whole stop, this was easy to do. I looked at the noise in each image. Here are some crops, magnified to about 200%.

ISO 1250
ISO 640
ISO 10000

 

 

ISO 5000

 

 

ISO 2500

 

ISO 1250

 

ISO 640

 

Pretty darned ISOless.

 

 

 

a7RIII

← a7RIII shadow noise — ISOs 640-5000 a7RIII shadow noise — ISOs 500 & 640 →

Comments

  1. Brian Patterson says

    August 6, 2018 at 6:22 am

    Jim,
    Would your ISOless techniques be applicable to the a6000/a6300 cameras? And I assume you just set exposure at the higher ISO’s in each test range and underexposed the lower ISO’s from there?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 6, 2018 at 7:37 am

      Pretty much, but the ISO where the conversion changes is different. Details here:

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-read-noise-modeling/

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-single-shot-low-iso-isolessness/

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-pushing-in-post-at-low-isos-single-shot-shutter/

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-pushing-in-post-at-higher-isos-single-shot-shutter/

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-more-pushing-in-post-at-higher-isos-single-shot-shutter/

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-pushing-in-post-at-low-isos-continuous-shutter/

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/sony-a6300-pushing-in-post-at-higher-isos-continuous-shutter/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.