the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, continuous shutter

Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, continuous shutter

March 18, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part of a long series of posts about the Sony a6300. The series starts here.

In the preceding post, I posted three series of images leaving the exposure the same, varying the ISO in full stop intervals, and pushing the images in post to make them have equal brightness. I used continuous shutter mode for those series, and demonstrated that the camera is not ISOless in continuous shutter mode.

Now I’m going to go one stop higher in ISO. I started at ISO 6400, close to, but below the point where the a6300 does low pass spatial filtering on its raw files, left the exposure the same, and made images at ISO 3200, 1600, 800, 400, and 200. Then, in Lightroom, I pushed the ISO 3200 image one stop, the ISO 1600 image two stops, and so on, until I got to the ISO 200 image, which got a five stop push.

Here’s the overall scene, as seen by the a6300 and a Zeiss Loxia 21/2.8, using Lightroom CC 2015.5 with default settings except for white balance:

S6301684-2

Now, we’ll give the shadows a +100 shadow move and crop to a part of the image with some dark areas, and make a set of 200% enlargements.

ISO 6400, no push
ISO 6400, no push
ISO 3200, one stop push
ISO 3200, one stop push

Not much change.

ISO 1600, two stop push
ISO 1600, two stop push

A little more noise.

ISO 800, three stop push
ISO 800, three stop push

A little more noise, but not much.

ISO 400, four stop push
ISO 400, four stop push

Noticeably more noise.

ISO 200, five stop push
ISO 200, five stop push

A lot more noise, since we just crossed the conversion gain change ISO.

 

 

The Last Word

← Sony a6300 — pushing in post at low ISOs, continuous shutter Zooms vs primes for non-experts →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.