I’ve been posting about some of the bad things about today’s digital photography universe for the last few days. Today, I’m gonna change gears and talk about some of the things I love about it. Productivity. A lot of chemical photography was difficult, uncreative, time-consuming work. Let’s say you wanted a print of something that… [Read More]
Overemphasizing tools
I used to write end-pieces for the CPA newsletter, Focus. Those were called “The Last Word”, because they were the last thing in the newsletter. Eventually, when I stopped editing the newsletter, the archives from Focus formed the first posts in this blog. One of the very first ones was about overemphasis of craft. Today’s post… [Read More]
Is it now easier to be a photographer?
What a set of changes has happened since, say, 1990! In 25-or-so years, we have gotten to a point where: Most first-world folks carry a camera with them at all times. The marginal cost of making an image is zero. The number of images exposed has skyrocketed. The quality of many of the ubiquitous cell-phone… [Read More]
Power tools are dangerous
When we worked in the darkroom, the tools we had for image manipulation were pretty crude by today’s standards. With silver-based B&W, we could crop, change size, lighten, darken, change contrast, dodge, burn, bleach (like dodging, but affecting only the lighter areas). Sharpening required pin-registered printing setups and fiddly mask-making; most of us didn’t bother…. [Read More]
Resolution improvements with bigger sensors
There was a poster on DPR who made the claim that the resolution of a good lens on a full frame camera would be 1.5 times that of the same lens on a APS-C camera with the same pixel count. I thought the improvement would be less than that. We debated a while, and then… [Read More]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- …
- 380
- Next Page »