the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / D850 / D850, 58/1.4 PDAF bias at various apertures

D850, 58/1.4 PDAF bias at various apertures

November 11, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is the 15th post in a series of Nikon D850 tests. The series starts here.

As a follow-up to the CDAF images in the previous post, I made a series of phase-detection autofocus (PDAF) images of my three-level target. The target uses a pattern devised by Horshack at the central AF point, which should give the camera something easy to focus on. The aperiodic nature of the target should avoid systematic errors that sometimes befall PDAF systems with subjects with regular repetition. 

Here’s the target:

Mounted to the door, it looks like this:

Here’s the protocol:

  • Nikon 58 mm f/1.4 on D850.
  • ISO 64
  • AF-S, single servo mode
  • Release priority: focus
  • Aperture exposure mode
  • f/1.4 through f/4 in whole stops
  • 32 exposures at each f-stop
  • EFCS on
  • Nikon remote release, half-pressed until confirmation observed
  • Lens ring racked between shots
  • Wescott LED panels set to 5500 K.
  • Target distance, 3 meters.

 I measured the MTF50 for the three raw color planes using dcraw in document mode, MTF Mapper, Matlab, and Excel.

Here are the results wide open:

The (invisible, in this plot, but visible in some of the others) lighter blue line is the average (mean) MTF50 of all 32 images in each plane of the target. The orange and gray lines have the standard deviation of the results (sigma) subtracted from and added to the mean. About 70% of the data points would lie between those two lines if the data were Gaussian. 

This is a nice, tight grouping, with the peak right in the middle, which is what we want to see.

The green channel doesn’t look as good, with the sharpest plane being nearer to the camera than the focus point. There’s also a fair amount of variation in the mid and far distances.

The blue channel looks just about as good as it could. Unfortunately, the green channel, the not-so-great one, is the most important.

Let’s see what happens when we stop down one stop.

Now we’re seeing some more variation in the red channel. The correct focusing distance for that channel appears to be between the mid and far planes.

The green channel, which was back-focused at f/1.4 is now much less so.

The blue channel appears to be properly focussed to a bit front focused. The blue channel is the least important one for most kinds of photography and subject matter.

One more stop down:

The red channel is more front-focused.

The green channel is close to perfect.

The blue channel is a hair back-focussed.

One last stop further down; after that the depth of field will swamp out the differences:

The red channel is slightly  front-focused.

The green channel is slightly back-focused.

We can’t say much about the blue channel.

You can see the issue of whether and how to fine-tune the PDAF system is more complicated than the way it’s usually described. What color channels do we want to use to optimize the focus point? What apertures are the most important? The D850 compensated for focus shift algorithmically for lenses that it recognizes, but apparently that compensation is not perfect. What distance should we use for the PDAF tuning?

Lots to think about. I’m not going to rush right out and fine-tune this lens.

 

D850

← Nikon 58/1.4 on D850, LoCA and CDAF Nikon D850 AF fine-tuning with the 58/1.4 →

Trackbacks

  1. Nikon D850 AF fine-tuning with the 58/1.4 says:
    November 12, 2017 at 10:14 am

    […] lens, and the same bias used for all distances and apertures for that lens. We’ve seen in this post that there are variations in PDAF bias with aperture (in spite of, or maybe because of, the way that […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.