• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Fuji GFX 100 IBIS performance with 32-64 mm zoom

Fuji GFX 100 IBIS performance with 32-64 mm zoom

October 13, 2019 JimK 2 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100”.

I’ve tested the GFX 100’s IBIS performance with the 110 mm f/2 lens here and here. The 110 is probably the native G lens that needs IBIS the most, since the 120 macro, the 100-200 zoom, and the 250/4 are all optically stabilized. There has been some interest in how the IBIS does with shorter focal lengths. I decided to use the 32-64 mm f/4 zoom to find out. I set it to 44 mm for this test, which is approximately equivalent to the 35 mm lens I used on the a7RIV in yesterday’s test. I set the aperture to f/5.6, which is also approximately equivalent to the f/4 used in the previous test, but that’s not why I chose those apertures: they are the about sharpest ones for each lens. I stood for this series, leaning against a railing behind me, which provided some extra steadiness.

Here’s the test scene, with the low-contrast slanted edge target centered:

 

Here are the details of the test conditions:

  • AF-C
  • Medium spot, centered
  • Continuous low drive mode
  • EFCS
  • Lossless compressed Raw
  • ISO 400
  • f/5.6
  • Exposure mode A, center weighting
  • 77 mm Heliopan variable neutral density filter

With IBIS on, set the filter to low attenuation, which gave me a shutter speed of about 1/1600 second. I made about 25 continuous-drive exposures, turned the filter down about a stop, and did it again. I kept on doing that until about 1/10 second, then turned IBIS off and ran the series again, this time stopping at 1/25 second (no point in being silly about this).

I ended up with about 400 images.  I developed them in Lightroom, with default settings except for the following:

  • White balance to gray below horizontal slanted edge
  • Adobe monochrome profile
  • Sharpening turned off
  • Noise reduction turned off

Using my automatic registration program, I adjusted the cropping in Lightroom for each image so that they were centered. I computed the MTF50 — a proxy for sharpness — for all the images with Imatest with the region of interest being a horizontal edge. Imatest spit out the data in cycles per pixel. With Matlab code that I’ve written, I converted that to cycles per picture height. For the statistics calculations, I removed outliers, which I defined as points more than two standard deviations away from the mean after conversion of the MTF50 samples with a logarithmic nonlinearity.

 

Performance is acceptable even at 1/5 second, although there are a some poor outliers there. By accident, I ran a duplicate test that included all but the slowest shutter speeds. When that data is included, things don’t change much:

The lack of any significant differences means that I can stick with 25ish shots in future IBIS testing.

With IBIS off:

1/25 is acceptable on average, but there are a lot of unsharp shots at that shutter speed.

Comparing IBIS with no IBIS:

Interpolating, the mean IBIS results at 1/5 second look about as good as the non-IBIS mean at 1/35. That’s a ratio of 7, or just under 3 stops. If we look at the mean-minus-sigma numbers, to get the 1/5 second IBIS sharpness, you’d need to use a shutter speed of about 1/40 second, which is close to the same ratio.

Here’s a comparison with yesterday’s test of the Zony 35/1.4 on the a7RIV:

 

Testing note: at 1/5 second, finder blackout in the GFX 100 makes it really hard to keep the target centered.

 

GFX 100

← Sony a7RIV IBIS with the 35 mm f/1.4 Zony Camera resolution and 4K viewing →

Comments

  1. jim Trotter says

    April 16, 2020 at 12:58 pm

    when using a tripod with the GFX should the IBIS be turned off ?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 16, 2020 at 1:32 pm

      Unless the tripod is unsteady and the exposure is short, yes.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.