• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Two ways to make 100 MP pixel-shifted images with the GFX 100S

Two ways to make 100 MP pixel-shifted images with the GFX 100S

April 25, 2021 JimK 4 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100S. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100S”.

A reader asked if you got better quality 100 MP images by using Fujifilm Pixel Shift Combiner in Accurate Color mode or by using High Resolution Plus Accurate Color mode and downsampling in post. This post attempts to answer that question, using a number of Photoshop standard resampling methods, and GigaPixel AI as well.

See the previous post for background.

Here’s the entire image.

 

Here are some crops, magnified about 200%:

Accurate Color Only

This is the reference. All the crops below were downsampled from the 400 MP image to 100 MP using the methods in the titles.

Bicubic sharper

This is what Photoshop picks if you set the method to “automatic”. There is less aliasing than with the Accurate COlor mode, and the image is crisper, too boot.

Bicubic

Just plain bicubic doesn’t have much aliasing at all, and is not as crisp as Bicubic Sharper, as you’d expect.

Bilinear

Bilinear has a fiar amount of aliasing, but a bit less that Accurate Color mode.

Preserve details 2

 

Preserve Details 2.0 is also quite good with respect to aliasing.

Now for something ugly:

Nearest Neighbor

Never, ever, use nearest neighbor for downsizing photographic images.

GigaPixel AI both versions 5.3.4 and 5.5 —  is terrible for this task.

GigaPixel 5.5

 

GigaPixel Ai 5.3.4

 

GFX 100, GFX 100S

← Fujifilm Pixel Shift Combiner Accurate Color mode An important GFX 100S accessory →

Comments

  1. Ilya Zakharevich says

    April 26, 2021 at 4:36 am

    (This was discussed here already — so this is addressed not to Jim, but to the readers who have not seen the previous discussion!)

    All the downscaling examples above are hindered by wrong algorithms used for rescaling. The continental divides here seems to be very clearly positioned: ALL the commercial solutions use the wrong algorithms, and ALL the freely available solutions¹⁾ allow downscaling WITH NO ARTIFACTS AT ALL.

     ¹⁾ … or at least all I know…

    (These “bugs” are due to using the rescaling algorithms in the non-linear colormaps.)

    Reply
  2. Zé De Boni says

    April 26, 2021 at 6:12 am

    In my monitor Accurate Color image shows aliasing up to 4 central circle radii from the center. Then there is a ghostly second order moiré, which I never noticed before (I wonder if the monitor grid plays a role on that). What is amazing is that all Photoshop downsampling methods, except the weird one, reduce the artifacts , while GigaPixel enhances them. It would be still interesting to know what would be the result of Pixel Shift done straight to 100 MP using just 4 shots like Sony does. Does Fuji provide a way to do it? Would it be possible to hack that, if one knows which are the 4 useable frames?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 26, 2021 at 6:28 am

      I suspect, but don’t know for sure, that Fujifilm PSC only uses four shots in Accurate Color mode.

      Reply
  3. Jean-Pierre Peretti says

    April 26, 2021 at 7:01 am

    Hello Jim,

    I was quite sure that your scientific curiosity wouldn’t leave this question without an answer 😉
    Anyway thank you for achieving it.
    Merci Monsieur.

    Jean-Pierre Peretti

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.