• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Focus stacking with the GFX 50S — a demo

Focus stacking with the GFX 50S — a demo

April 21, 2018 JimK 4 Comments

I wrote a post on the nuts and bolts of the poorly-named focus- bracketing feature that arrived with the current version of the GFX firmware.  Now I’ll give you a little demo.

The setup:

There’s a Fuji 120 mm f/4 macro on the camera. The lights are two Godox 600 TTL Pro strobes. I’m not firing the strobes, but just using the modeling lights. There’s a Phottix snoot on the near strobe and an 18-inch beauty dish with a diffuser over it on the far strobe. I set the shutter mode to electronic, to avoid vibration. Then I programmed the focus bracketing for 64 shots, using a step size of 7, which gives about a 14 micrometer (um) worst-case circle of confusion (CoC).

I combined the images with Helicon Focus. I tried all three modes, and what you see below is the image with the default weighted-average mode with default settings.

As it turned out, I didn’t need all 64 images; about 50 would have been enough. But it’s hard to figure out where the camera is going to focus at the end of one of these runs, and it’s better to have too many images to stack than too few.

By the way, Helicon Focus is very good at parallelizing its operations and getting the most it can out of the cores available.

 

 

GFX 50S

← Capture One and Fuji GFX 50S focus stacking Light painting with the GFX 50S — a demo →

Comments

  1. Arthur says

    April 23, 2018 at 7:05 pm

    Hi Jim,

    I use Phottix also and bought that snoot – one of the things I noticed when testing it was that it created an interference pattern.

    Have you noticed it as well?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 23, 2018 at 8:22 pm

      I never noticed that. I hardly ever use it without the grid. How about you?

      Reply
  2. Arthur says

    April 25, 2018 at 5:21 pm

    Non grid but I’ll try again with the grid. It’s been collecting dust since the initial tests.

    Reply
  3. Sharon Van Lieu says

    August 9, 2018 at 11:47 am

    Jim, thank you so much for all the information you post. It’s been a great help to me learning the gfx.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.