• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / New presentation of on- and off-axis contrast of all GF primes

New presentation of on- and off-axis contrast of all GF primes

July 12, 2021 JimK 6 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100S. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100S”. Since it’s more about the lenses than the camera, I’m also tagging it with the other Fuji GFX tags.

In previous posts, I tested the off axis performance of the Fujifilm 110 mm f/2, 80 mm f/1.7 , 250 mm f/4, 63 mm f/2.8, 45 mm f/2.8, 50mm f/3.5, 30mm f/3.5, 23mm f/4, and 120 mm f/4 macro GF lenses on a GFX 100S. I presented summary data in the last two posts. In response to reader feedback, I’ve developed new ways to present that data.

Here’s a sample:

The above plots the MTF50 (the white-balanced raw data) for the shorter GF primes, the 23, 30, 45, 50, and 63. Each is measured in the center and on the right side of the frame (in landscape orientation). The right side measurements are made in two directions: with a radial edge, and with a tangential one. The measurements are grouped by f-stop, and for each stop they are also grouped into three, for the center data, and the two right side data sets. Each lens has a different color. The gaps between the groups are intended to make it easier to compare lenses under the three different conditions.

Here is the same graph for the longer primes:

I’ve done the same thing with microcontrast:

 

Does that help?

GFX 100, GFX 100S, GFX 50S

← Comparing the Fuji GF long primes Aliasing and the Fuji GF primes →

Comments

  1. Tony A says

    July 14, 2021 at 5:53 pm

    The new layout is more clear to me

    Reply
    • Sebastian says

      July 15, 2021 at 6:04 am

      Agreed, both the gaps and the identical color for each lens’s field position/orientation makes the charts a lot easier to read.

      Reply
  2. Jaapd says

    October 16, 2022 at 8:47 am

    Hi Jim,
    I’m reading your MTF, micro contrast, and LoCa measurements with great interest. Any opportunity to create some graphs containing the data of the 3 zoom lenses aigainst their fix focal point counterparts?
    Thanks in advance!
    JaapD

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 16, 2022 at 8:50 am

      I’ll consider that. I have two more zooms to test. THese tests are time consuming, so it may be a while before I get to them.

      Reply
    • JimK says

      October 19, 2022 at 7:12 am

      I can do that, but not for a few weeks.

      Reply
      • JaapD says

        October 19, 2022 at 11:19 am

        Thanks a lot Jim, it’s much appreciated!

        regards,
        Jaap.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.