• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Sony 135 mm STF on GFX 50R

Sony 135 mm STF on GFX 50R

October 10, 2020 JimK 6 Comments

Yesterday I received a Fotodiox Sony A to GFX adapter, and today I mounted a Sony 135 SLT (apodized) lens on it. I mounted the lens on a GFX 50R.

 

To my surprise and great pleasure, it covers the 33×44 format with no vignetting.

The equivalent FF focal length for the same image height is 98mm. I haven’t checked for corner sharpness, but if you’re shooting portraits, that really doesn’t matter. It is a manual focus lens, though.

I think this is great news!

GFX 50S

← Nikon 70-200/2.8 S corner transition point spread functions 70-200/2.8 E vs S at 200mm, quantitative →

Comments

  1. Christer Almqvist says

    October 11, 2020 at 6:34 am

    Is the fact that it covers the 33×44 format with no vignetting a hint that Sony will use 33×44 mm sensors in the future?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 11, 2020 at 6:59 am

      I doubt it. This lens was designed for Sony SLRs.

      Reply
  2. Alexander Häggström says

    October 12, 2020 at 4:44 am

    Hi Jim,

    I have also used this combination of lens and camera, inspired by the by the exellent off-axis OOF PSFs of the Sony 135/2.8 STF that you showed in 2017, and found that image quality is very good with just a tiny amount of field curvature and loss of sharpness in the extreme corners.

    It would be very interesting to see the lens’ performance on the Fuji GFX in shots of Siemens star and point spread functions.

    Best regards,
    Alexander

    Reply
  3. CarVac says

    October 13, 2020 at 6:05 am

    The Minolta STF was designed to have zero vignetting on FF to prevent bokeh cutoff, so it makes sense that it can cover a larger format satisfactorily.

    Reply
  4. Alexander Häggström says

    February 25, 2021 at 6:14 am

    Does the Sony 135 STF work well on your IR-modified GFX-50R?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 25, 2021 at 6:32 am

      Interesting question. I’ll give it a shot.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.