• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / 50/1.8 Nikkor S on Z7 — LoCA and focus shift

50/1.8 Nikkor S on Z7 — LoCA and focus shift

December 15, 2018 JimK 2 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z6 and Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”.

This is the first lab test of the 50 mm f/1.8 Nikkor S that I’ve done. I mounted the lens on a Z7 body and aimed it at my checkerboard ramp target. The setup looked like this (although this particular picture shows the 105/1.4 on the camera):

 

Target distance was 1.4 meters.  I focused once, wide open, then made 16 exposures at one-third aperture intervals all the way through f/5.6 using the intervalometer that you can see on the left in the above picture. I used electronic shutter and a 4-second interval.  I processed the data in my Matlab program, and this is what it spit out:

 

 

I’ve plotted the three Adobe RGB color channels. The graph presents the displacement of the image projected on the sensor from the desired green-channel focal plane. Negative numbers indicate front-focusing. The image-plane shift is in micrometers (um).  The blue focus locations are separated from the red and green ones because of the longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) of the lens. The dots indicate the results for each of the 16 exposures at each f-stop. I’ve made lines indicating the average (aka mean or mu) of the sample set bolder and added thin lines above and below the means that are one standard deviation (sigma) away from it.

To see the effect on photographs, it’s better to look at the diameters of the circles of confusion (CoCs) implied by the above displacements of the image plane.

 

 

In the above graph, I’ve used the convention that negative CoCs indicate front-focusing. Of course, the actual CoC diameter can never be negative. All the focus shift CoCs are under 3 um. The pitch of the sensor is a bit over 4 um, so this is very little focus shift. Focus shift is not too important with the Z7 anyway, since the camera normally focuses at taking aperture for f/5.6 and wider.

The distance between the focus locations of the three color planes is an indication of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). Wide open, it’s only enough to cause the blue plane to be back-focused to the tune of a 3 um CoC, and it gets better as you stop down. This is an excellent performance.

Compare that with the Zony 55 on an a7RIII:

 

LoCA is the Achilles heel of the Zony 55, and you can sure see it here.

I am quite impressed with the Nikkor S. For the money, it is a superlative instrument in the testing I’ve done so far.

Nikon Z6/7

← More LED banding with the Nikon Z7 Nikon Z7 w/ 50/1.8S — face detection focus bias →

Comments

  1. Michael Sullivan says

    December 18, 2018 at 7:56 am

    So, why do you think the Z camera insist on focusing at the selected aperture then? What’s the benefit other than eliminating a bit of focus shift? And, would it be better if Nikon at least offered an option to allow lenses to focus wide open?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 18, 2018 at 8:03 am

      The benefit is, as you say, eliminating the effect of focus shift. It appears this lens will not greatly improve focusing accuracy because of focusing stopped down, but it looks like the Nikon designers opted fora one size fits all strategy, unlike Sony.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.